Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
string vs integer
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
string vs integer
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
string
var result ; for(var i = 0; i < 1000; i++){ result = 'sto' === 'sica'; }
integer
var result for(var i = 0; i < 1000; i++){ result = 1 === 2 }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
string
integer
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/18.4 Safari/605.1.15
Browser/OS:
Safari 18 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
string
2952080.2 Ops/sec
integer
2949584.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its test cases. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of JavaScript string comparison with integer comparison. The goal is to determine which approach is faster, considering various factors like browser, device platform, operating system, and executions per second. **Test Cases** There are two individual test cases: 1. **String Comparison**: The benchmark definition includes a loop that performs a string comparison using the '===' operator: `'sto' === 'sica';`. This test case aims to measure the performance of string comparisons in JavaScript. 2. **Integer Comparison**: The second test case involves an integer comparison using the '===' operator: `1 === 2;`. This test case is designed to evaluate the performance of integer comparisons in JavaScript. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares two main options: 1. **String Comparison**: Uses the '===' operator for string comparisons. 2. **Integer Comparison**: Uses the '===' operator for integer comparisons. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** Both approaches use the same '===' operator, which is a built-in JavaScript operator that checks for equality between values. However, there are some subtle differences: * **String Comparison**: When comparing strings using '===', JavaScript performs a case-sensitive comparison by default. This means that uppercase letters will be treated as distinct from lowercase letters. While this might seem like a minor detail, it can affect the performance of string comparisons. * **Integer Comparison**: Integer comparisons in JavaScript are typically performed using signed 32-bit integers on most systems. In many cases, integer values are equivalent (e.g., -1 === -1), but not equal. **Library and Purpose** There is no specific library mentioned in the provided benchmark definition or test cases. The '===' operator is a built-in JavaScript operator that performs comparisons without relying on external libraries. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There doesn't appear to be any special JavaScript feature or syntax explicitly used in these benchmark definitions. However, it's worth noting that some features like strict mode or certain ECMAScript versions might affect the performance of string and integer comparisons. **Other Alternatives** Some alternative approaches for comparing values could include: * Using explicit comparison operators (e.g., `===`, `!==`). * Utilizing regular expressions to perform pattern matching. * Leveraging libraries like Lodash or Ramda for functional programming-style comparisons.
Related benchmarks:
parseInt vs toString vs string literal vs + empty string
String to int vs int to string 2
parseInt vs toString vs string literal vs + empty string vs String constructor
String to number, parseInt, +, or * 1
Number.isInteger() vs typeof
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?