Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
classListFighter vs classNameFighter
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
classNameFighter vs classListFighter
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div id="foo"></div>
Tests:
classNameFighter
var element = document.getElementById("foo"); var i = 1000; while (i--) { element.className += `bar${i}`; }
classListFighter
var element = document.getElementById("foo"); var i = 1000; var cl = element.classList; while (i--) { cl.add(`foo${i}`); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
classNameFighter
classListFighter
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll explain the benchmark and its options in detail. **Benchmark Overview** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test created on MeasureThat.net. The benchmark compares two approaches to add classes to an HTML element: using `className` property (denoted as "classNameFighter") and using `classList` API (denoted as "classListFighter"). **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: 1. **`element.className += 'bar' + i`**: This approach uses the `className` property to add classes to the element. It concatenates a string with the class name, which may lead to performance issues due to string interning and caching. 2. **`cl.add('foo' + i)`**: This approach uses the `classList` API, which is a more modern and efficient way of managing classes on elements. It adds a single class to the element without concatenating strings. **Pros and Cons** 1. **`element.className += 'bar' + i`**: * Pros: Simple and easy to understand. * Cons: + May lead to performance issues due to string interning and caching. + Does not take advantage of the `classList` API. 2. **`cl.add('foo' + i)`**: * Pros: + More efficient, as it uses a single class addition operation. + Takes advantage of the `classList` API, which is optimized for performance. * Cons: + May require more complex code to manage classes. **Library and Purpose** The `classList` API is a part of the HTML DOM specification, introduced in HTML5. It provides an efficient way to add and remove classes from elements, with methods like `add`, `remove`, and `toggle`. The `cl` variable in the benchmark refers to this API. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that older browsers may not support the `classList` API, which could affect the test results. **Alternative Approaches** Other approaches to add classes to an element might include: 1. **Using `style` property**: `element.style += 'bar' + i`. This approach uses the `style` property to set a CSS style attribute on the element. 2. **Using `setAttribute` method**: `element.setAttribute('class', 'foo' + i)`. This approach uses the `setAttribute` method to set the class attribute directly. However, these approaches may not be as efficient or modern as using the `classList` API.
Related benchmarks:
className vs classList by Tyler
querySelector vs querySelector 2
DataAttribute vs Class Selector on body
tag VS class
querySelector vs classList.contains
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?