Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
undefined vs. typeof vs. in vs. hasOwnProperty
(version: 0)
Object lookup performance
Comparing performance of:
undefined vs typeof vs in vs hasOwnProperty vs truthy
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var obj = { a: 1, b: 2, c: 3, d: 4, e: 5 };
Tests:
undefined
undefined !== obj.d;
typeof
'undefined' !== typeof obj.d;
in
'd' in obj;
hasOwnProperty
obj.hasOwnProperty( 'd' );
truthy
!! obj.d;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (5)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
undefined
typeof
in
hasOwnProperty
truthy
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks. **Benchmark Definition** The provided JSON represents a benchmark that tests the performance of different object lookup methods in JavaScript: * `undefined !== obj.d;` * `'undefined' !== typeof obj.d;` * `'d' in obj;` * `obj.hasOwnProperty('d');` * `!! obj.d;` These test cases aim to measure the execution time and speed of each method, which is essential for optimizing object lookup performance. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares five different methods for checking if a property exists or has a specific value: 1. **`undefined !== obj.d;`**: Checks if `obj.d` is not equal to `undefined`. 2. **`'undefined' !== typeof obj.d;`**: Compares the string `'undefined'` with the type of `obj.d` using the `typeof` operator. 3. **`'d' in obj;`**: Uses the `in` operator to check if property name `'d'` exists in object `obj`. 4. **`obj.hasOwnProperty('d');`**: Checks if `obj` has a property with the name `'d'` using the `hasOwnProperty` method. 5. **`!! obj.d;`**: Uses the double-bang operator (`!!`) to convert `obj.d` to a boolean value. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** Here's a brief summary of each approach: 1. **`undefined !== obj.d;`**: * Pros: Simple, fast. * Cons: Can be slower for large objects due to property lookup overhead. 2. **`'undefined' !== typeof obj.d;`**: * Pros: Portable across different environments (including older browsers). * Cons: May be slower than other methods due to the type check. 3. **`'d' in obj;`**: * Pros: Fast and efficient for simple object lookups. * Cons: May not work correctly if `obj` has a property with the same name as another value (e.g., `{a: 'd', b: 2}`). 4. **`obj.hasOwnProperty('d');`**: * Pros: Ensures correct behavior even when dealing with inherited properties. * Cons: May be slower than other methods due to additional method call overhead. 5. **`!! obj.d;`**: * Pros: Concise and easy to read. * Cons: May not work correctly if `obj.d` is an empty value (e.g., `''`, `0`, `null`, etc.). **Library and Purpose** None of the above methods use any external libraries. They are all built-in JavaScript operators or methods. **Special JS Features or Syntax** The benchmark uses the following special features: * **`typeof` operator**: Returns a string indicating the type of its operand. * **`in` operator**: Tests if an object has a property with a given name. * **`hasOwnProperty` method**: Checks if an object has a property with the same name as the current object. **Other Alternatives** If you need to optimize object lookup performance in your JavaScript code, consider using: 1. **`Object.hasOwn` method**: Similar to `hasOwnProperty`, but ensures correct behavior even when dealing with inherited properties. 2. **`Map` data structure**: Provides fast and efficient key-value storage and retrieval. 3. **`Proxy` objects**: Allow you to control property access and manipulation, which can improve performance in certain scenarios. Keep in mind that the choice of method depends on your specific use case and requirements. MeasureThat.net provides a valuable resource for benchmarking different approaches and finding the best solution for your needs.
Related benchmarks:
undefined vs. typeof vs. in vs. hasOwnProperty
undefined vs. typeof vs. in vs. hasOwnProperty 2
undefined vs. typeof vs. in vs. hasOwnProperty big object
undefined vs. typeof vs. in vs. hasOwnProperty 222
hasOwn vs hasOwnProperty vs typeof
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?