Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
undefined vs. typeof vs. in vs. hasOwnProperty vs non strict
(version: 0)
Object lookup performance
Comparing performance of:
undefined vs typeof vs in vs hasOwnProperty vs bool vs non strict equal
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var obj = { a: 1, b: 2, c: 3, d: 4, e: 5 };
Tests:
undefined
undefined !== obj.d;
typeof
'undefined' !== typeof obj.d;
in
'd' in obj;
hasOwnProperty
obj.hasOwnProperty( 'd' );
bool
!! obj.d;
non strict equal
obj.d != null
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (6)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
undefined
typeof
in
hasOwnProperty
bool
non strict equal
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition represents the test case being run. In this case, the test is object lookup performance, and it compares six different approaches: 1. `undefined` 2. `typeof` (checking if a variable is an object or not) 3. `in` (a boolean expression using the `in` operator) 4. `hasOwnProperty` (a method to check if an object has a property with a given name) 5. `!!` (a boolean conversion operator, which converts its operand to a boolean value) - Note: This test actually uses `bool`, not `!!`. I'll explain the difference later. 6. `non strict equal` (a non-strict equality check using `!= null`) **Options Compared** The options compared are: * `undefined`: Using the literal value `undefined` * `typeof`: Checking if an object exists, but not its type * `in`: A boolean expression that checks for property existence * `hasOwnProperty`: A method to check if an object has a property with a given name * `!!` (or `bool`, as mentioned earlier): A boolean conversion operator **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **Undefined**: This approach is simple and straightforward but may not be the most efficient way to check for undefined values, especially in modern JavaScript environments. 2. **typeof**: Checking if an object exists can lead to unexpected results if the variable has been deleted or is a host object (e.g., `undefined`). However, it's often faster than using `in` or `hasOwnProperty`. 3. **In**: The `in` operator checks for property existence and returns a boolean value. It can be slower than using `typeof`, especially for large objects. 4. **HasOwnProperty**: This method is specific to objects and checks if the object has a property with a given name. While it's slower than `typeof`, it provides more accurate results, as it doesn't return false positives like `in` might. 5. **!!** (or `bool`): This conversion operator converts its operand to a boolean value. It's fast and efficient but may not provide the same level of accuracy as using `hasOwnProperty`. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** The test uses special JavaScript features: * The `!!` operator is used, which converts its operand to a boolean value. * The `bool` variable is declared, which holds the result of the conversion (in this case, `false`, since `obj.d` is not null). * The `hasOwnProperty` method is used to check if an object has a property with a given name. **Other Alternatives** If you need to perform object lookup checks in JavaScript, other alternatives include: * Using the `Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call()` method (which is similar to `hasOwnProperty`, but can be called on any object) * Using a simple `if` statement or conditional expression to check for undefined values * Using the `===` operator (strict equality) and checking if both sides are not null Keep in mind that performance differences between these approaches may vary depending on your specific use case, JavaScript environment, and hardware. For this particular benchmark, MeasureThat.net is comparing the performance of different object lookup approaches to determine which one is the fastest.
Related benchmarks:
undefined vs. typeof vs. in vs. hasOwnProperty
undefined vs. hasOwnProperty
undefined vs. typeof vs. in vs. hasOwnProperty 2
undefined vs. typeof vs. in vs. hasOwnProperty big object
undefined vs. typeof vs. in vs. hasOwnProperty 222
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?