Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Dev test2
(version: 7)
Comparing performance of:
1 vs 2
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div id="test">1</div>
Script Preparation code:
var div = document.getElementById("test"); div.className = "test" var txt = "test";
Tests:
1
for(var i=0; i<1000;i++){ }
2
for(var i=0; i<1000;i++){ }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
1
2
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases. **Benchmark Definition:** The benchmark definition is a JSON object that represents a microbenchmark to be executed by MeasureThat.net. The key aspects of this definition are: * **Script Preparation Code**: This code snippet is executed once before running each test case. In this example, it retrieves an HTML element with the id "test" and sets its class name to "test". It also assigns a string value "test" to a variable `txt`. * **Html Preparation Code**: This code snippet is executed only once before running all test cases. In this example, it creates an HTML element with the id "test" containing the text "1". **Test Cases:** There are two individual test cases: * **Case 1**: The benchmark definition contains a `for` loop that increments a variable `i` from 0 to 1000. This loop is likely intended to be executed repeatedly, and its performance is being measured. * **Case 2**: The benchmark definition also contains a `for` loop similar to Case 1, but with an additional newline character (`\r\n`) after each iteration. **Options Compared:** The two test cases are compared in terms of the number of executions per second. This means that MeasureThat.net is measuring how many times the loop can execute within a given time period (likely measured by the system clock). **Pros and Cons of Different Approaches:** 1. **Case 1**: The loop without the additional newline character. * Pros: Should be more efficient, as it avoids unnecessary newline characters that might cause some overhead. * Cons: None mentioned in this context. 2. **Case 2**: The loop with an additional newline character. * Pros: Might provide a more realistic representation of production code, where whitespace is often used for readability. * Cons: Could introduce performance overhead due to the extra newline characters. **Other Considerations:** * In both cases, the loops are identical except for the presence or absence of the newline character. This suggests that the benchmark is focused on measuring the impact of this specific detail on performance. * The use of a simple `for` loop implies that the focus is on basic iteration and execution speed. **Library/Other Dependencies:** None mentioned in this context. **Special JS Features/Syntax:** * None explicitly mentioned, but it's worth noting that MeasureThat.net might be using some internal libraries or optimizations to execute the benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
GetElementByClassName vs GetElementById
get element
Test read speed
id vs class test
class vs id test
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?