Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
test1 array concat vs spred 2000+1000
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
spred vs concat
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var arr1 = new Array(2000).fill(124); var arr2 = new Array(2000).fill(541);
Tests:
spred
var other = [ ...arr1, ...arr2 ]
concat
var other = arr1.concat(arr2);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
spred
concat
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to help explain the provided benchmark. **Benchmark Purpose and Options** The provided benchmark is designed to compare two different approaches for concatenating two arrays in JavaScript: using `Array.prototype.concat()` (denoted as "concat") and using the spread operator (`...`) (denoted as "spred"). **Options Compared** 1. **`Array.prototype.concat()`**: This method creates a new array by copying elements from both input arrays. 2. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: This operator creates a new array by spreading the elements of one or more arrays. **Pros and Cons** * **Concatenation (concat)**: + Pros: widely supported, easy to read and understand, can handle large datasets efficiently. + Cons: creates a new array object, which can lead to memory overhead for very large datasets. * **Spread Operator (`...`)**: + Pros: creates a new array with minimal memory overhead, can be more efficient than concatenation for large datasets. + Cons: syntax may not be as intuitive for some developers, requires JavaScript version 8 or later. **Library and Special JS Feature** None of the provided benchmarks use any external libraries. The spread operator is a built-in feature in modern JavaScript (since ECMAScript 2015). No special JavaScript features are mentioned in this benchmark, but it's worth noting that the use of `Array.prototype.concat()` and the spread operator might not be supported by older versions of JavaScript. **Alternative Approaches** There are other ways to concatenate arrays in JavaScript, such as: 1. **Using `Array.prototype.push()`**: This method appends one or more elements to an existing array. 2. **Using a loop**: A simple loop can also be used to append elements from two arrays. Here is an example of using `Array.prototype.push()`:```javascript var arr1 = [1, 2, 3]; var arr2 = [4, 5, 6]; arr1.push(...arr2); ``` Using a loop would require more code and may be less efficient than the spread operator or concatenation: ```javascript var arr1 = [1, 2, 3]; var arr2 = [4, 5, 6]; for (var i = 0; i < arr2.length; i++) { arr1.push(arr2[i]); } ``` The spread operator is generally considered the most efficient and convenient way to concatenate arrays in modern JavaScript.
Related benchmarks:
Array concat vs spread
Array push vs spread vs concat large
.concat vs. spread
Large Array: concat vs spread vs push
Array concat vs spread operator vs push large
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?