Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
class query vs data query
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Get by data vs Get by class
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div class="test"></div> <div data-test="1"></div>
Tests:
Get by data
document.querySelector('[data-test="1"]')
Get by class
document.getElementsByClassName('.test');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Get by data
Get by class
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark JSON and explain what's being tested, compared, and the pros/cons of each approach. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is comparing two ways to select elements in an HTML document: 1. **Class Query**: `document.querySelector('[data-test="1"]')` 2. **Data Attribute Query**: `document.getElementsByClassName('.test');` Both methods are used to retrieve elements with specific attributes or properties. **Approaches and their pros/cons** ### Class Query (`document.querySelector`) * **Pros**: + Faster, since it only looks at the element's class list. + Can be more efficient for large sets of elements with similar classes. * **Cons**: + May not work correctly if the element has multiple classes or if the class name is a valid CSS selector (e.g., `.class`). + Requires the exact class name, which may lead to false negatives. ### Data Attribute Query (`document.getElementsByClassName`) * **Pros**: + More flexible than class query, as it can look at any attribute, not just classes. + Can be more reliable, since it checks for the presence of a specific attribute on all elements, regardless of other attributes or properties. * **Cons**: + Slower, since it needs to iterate over all elements in the DOM and check each one's data attributes. + May perform poorly if there are many elements with similar data attributes. **Library usage** None of the benchmark tests seem to use any external libraries. The `document.querySelector` and `document.getElementsByClassName` methods are built-in JavaScript APIs. **Special JS features or syntax** There is no special JS feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. Both tests only rely on standard JavaScript DOM traversal methods. **Other alternatives** For data attribute queries, other approaches could be: * Using the `getAttribute` method to retrieve the specific attribute value: `document.querySelector('[data-test="1"]').getAttribute('data-test')` * Using a CSS selector with the `:has` pseudo-class to select elements that have the specified attribute: `document.querySelectorAll('[data-test="1"]:has([data-foo="bar"])')` These alternatives would likely be slower and less efficient than using `document.getElementsByClassName`. Overall, this benchmark provides a simple comparison of two common DOM traversal methods in JavaScript. The results can help developers understand which approach is faster and more reliable for their specific use cases.
Related benchmarks:
DataAttribute vs Class Selector vs ID Selector
querySelectorAll data attribute vs class name 3
DataAttribute vs Class Selector vs ID Selector vs ~=
DataAttribute vs Class Selector vs ID GetById
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?