Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
POJO vs Functions no loop
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
POJO vs Function vs Function w/ return
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var obj = {};
Tests:
POJO
var x = { value : 1, label : 'Codice fiscale', valueStyle : { fontsize: 14 }, isEmpty : function() { return !1==2 }, isVisible : true, style : { xs_width: "100%", sm_width: "50%", xs_marginBottom: 20, sm_paddingRight: 5 }, otherStuff : [ { style: {color: "red", xs_width: "100%", sm_width: "50%", xs_marginBottom: 20, sm_paddingRight: 5} , class: "test" }, { style: {color: "blue"}, class: "tost" } ] };
Function
obj = function() { var x = { value : 1, label : 'Codice fiscale', valueStyle : { fontsize: 14 }, isEmpty : function() { return !1==2 }, isVisible : true, style : { xs_width: "100%", sm_width: "50%", xs_marginBottom: 20, sm_paddingRight: 5 }, otherStuff : [ { style: {color: "red", xs_width: "100%", sm_width: "50%", xs_marginBottom: 20, sm_paddingRight: 5} , class: "test" }, { style: {color: "blue"}, class: "tost" } ] }; return x; }
Function w/ return
var y = function() { return { value : 1, label : 'Codice fiscale', valueStyle : { fontsize: 14 }, isEmpty : function() { return !1==2 }, isVisible : true, style : { xs_width: "100%", sm_width: "50%", xs_marginBottom: 20, sm_paddingRight: 5 }, otherStuff : [ { style: {color: "red", xs_width: "100%", sm_width: "50%", xs_marginBottom: 20, sm_paddingRight: 5} , class: "test" }, { style: {color: "blue"}, class: "tost" } ] }; }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
POJO
Function
Function w/ return
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the details of the provided benchmark. **What is tested:** The benchmark tests two approaches to defining an object with nested properties and methods: 1. **Object Literal (POJO - Plain Old JavaScript Object)**: The first test case uses an object literal syntax, where `var obj = {};`. This approach defines an object using curly brackets `{}` and key-value pairs. 2. **Function Expression**: The second test case uses a function expression syntax, where `obj = function() {...}`. This approach defines a function that returns an object. **Options compared:** The benchmark compares the performance of these two approaches: 1. **POJO (Object Literal)**: Defines an object using curly brackets `{}` and key-value pairs. 2. **Function Expression**: Defines a function that returns an object. **Pros and Cons:** * **POJO (Object Literal) Pros:** + Easier to read and write, especially for complex objects with multiple nested properties. + More concise syntax. * **POJO (Object Literal) Cons:** + Less flexible, as the order of properties is determined by the object literal syntax. * **Function Expression Pros:** + More flexible, as the function can be reused and its properties can be dynamically added or removed. + Can be used to create objects on the fly. * **Function Expression Cons:** + Less readable and more verbose than POJO. **Library usage:** The benchmark does not use any external libraries. The test cases only rely on JavaScript's built-in features. **Special JS feature or syntax:** This benchmark uses a few special features, including: * The `var` keyword with the assignment operator (`=`) to declare variables. * The arrow function syntax (`=>`) is not used in this benchmark. * The use of template literals (the `\r\n` and `\t` characters) for formatting string literals. **Other alternatives:** There are other approaches to defining objects, such as: 1. **Constructor functions**: Define a constructor function that returns an object using the `new` keyword. 2. **Class declarations**: Use class declarations with static properties and methods. 3. **Arrow function expressions**: Define small functions using arrow function syntax (`=>`). However, these alternatives are not tested in this benchmark. Overall, the benchmark provides a good insight into the performance differences between object literals and function expressions in JavaScript.
Related benchmarks:
Optional chaining vs Empty method
instanceof vs typeof for objects
instanceof vs typeof gyuguyguy
instanceof vs typeof vs !!
instanceof vs typeof vs !!value
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?