Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Test checker
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
exac vs match
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
exac
const str = "ReguralExpresion RegExr"; const regex = /ex[a-z]/ig; var myArray = [...regex.exec(str)];
match
const str = "ReguralExpresion RegExr"; const regex = /ex[a-z]/ig; const match = str.match(regex);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
exac
match
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into explaining what's being tested in the provided JSON benchmark. **Overall Goal** The primary goal of the benchmark is to compare the performance of two different approaches for executing regular expressions on a given string: `exec()` and `match()`. The test aims to determine which method is faster and more efficient. **Options Compared** There are two options being compared: 1. **`exec()`**: This method executes the regular expression on the entire string and returns an array of matches. 2. **`match()`**: This method searches for a match anywhere in the string and returns an array with the first match, or `null` if no match is found. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** * **`exec()`**: + Pros: Can be more efficient when searching for a single specific pattern, as it only scans the input string once. + Cons: Returns an array of matches, which can lead to unnecessary memory allocation and copying. Additionally, if no match is found, it returns `null`, which may not be immediately apparent in some contexts. * **`match()`**: + Pros: More convenient for simple searches with a single pattern, as it only needs to find the first match. It also returns a value that can be easily compared (the matched string or `null`). + Cons: Slower than `exec()` when searching for a specific pattern, as it scans the input string twice (once to find the match and once to extract the match). **Other Considerations** * **Regex Flag**: Both tests use the `i` flag (case-insensitive) and `g` flag (global). The `i` flag makes the search case-insensitive, while the `g` flag makes it global, finding all matches in the string. * **String Handling**: The input string is a fixed, literal string containing the phrase "ReguralExpresion RegExr". This ensures that both tests are comparing apples to apples, with no external dependencies or variations in input. **Library Usage** None of the tests explicitly use a library. However, it's worth noting that JavaScript engines (like V8) have built-in support for regular expressions and string manipulation methods. **Special JS Features/Syntax** There is a special feature being used here: template literals (`\r\n` notation). This allows us to create multiline strings with newline characters, making the code more readable. However, it's not a core JavaScript syntax, but rather an extension introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). **Alternatives** Other alternatives for comparing performance could include: * Using different regular expression flavors or syntax * Comparing performance on different platforms or browsers * Experimenting with different data sets or string lengths * Using other optimization techniques, like caching or memoization Keep in mind that the choice of benchmark options and approach depends on the specific problem domain, requirements, and goals.
Related benchmarks:
Bitmask implicit boolean vs bitmask explicit equals
Multiple Nil checks
!= vs >= war
Battle of the bools
Nullish coalescing V.S. if/else (native)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?