Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
lodash isEqual to manual equal
(version: 0)
Compares lodash equal and manual equal performance
Comparing performance of:
Lodash vs Manual
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var j1 = { "S": { "Property1": { "Coord": 7951392.9519541, "Property2": "Solid", "Property3": { "Color": [ 255, 255, 255, 59 ] }, "BackgroundColour": { "Color": [ 255, 255, 0, 255 ] } } } }; var j2 = { "S": { "Property1": { "Coord": 7951392.9519541, "Property2": "Solid", "Property3": { "Color": [ 255, 255, 255, 60 ] }, "BackgroundColour": { "Color": [ 255, 255, 0, 255 ] } } } }; function isEqual(first, second) { if (first === undefined || first === null || second === undefined || second === null) { return first === second; } if (first.constructor === Object && second.constructor === Object) { var firstKeys = Object.keys(first).sort(function(i1, i2){ return i1.localeCompare(i2); }); var secondKeys = Object.keys(second).sort(function(i1, i2){ return i1.localeCompare(i2); }); if (firstKeys.length !== secondKeys.length) { return false; } var result = true; for (var i = 0; i < firstKeys.length && result; i++) { result &&= firstKeys[i] === secondKeys[i] && isEqual(first[firstKeys[i]], second[secondKeys[i]]); } return result; } if (first.constructor === Array && second.constructor === Array) { if (first.length !== second.length) { return false; } var result = true; for (var i = 0; i < first.length && result; i++) { result &&= isEqual(first[i], second[i]); } return result; } return first === second; }
Tests:
Lodash
_.isEqual(j1, j1); _.isEqual(j1, j2);
Manual
isEqual(j1, j1); isEqual(j1, j2);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Lodash
Manual
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is being tested, compared, and their pros/cons. **Benchmark Definition JSON** The benchmark compares two approaches to equality checking: Lodash's `isEqual` function and a manual implementation of equality checking using JavaScript primitives (e.g., `===`, `typeof`, `Object.keys()`, etc.). **Lodash `isEqual` Function** Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for tasks like string manipulation, array manipulation, and object comparison. The `isEqual` function checks if two objects or arrays are equal, taking into account their structure, properties, and values. In this benchmark, the Lodash `isEqual` function is tested with two input objects: `j1` and `j2`. `j1` has some nested properties, including an array of color values, while `j2` has a similar structure but with different values in its `Color` array. **Manual Equality Checking** The manual implementation of equality checking uses JavaScript primitives like `===`, `typeof`, and `Object.keys()` to compare two objects or arrays. This approach requires more code and is generally less concise than using a library function like Lodash's `isEqual`. In this benchmark, the manual implementation of equality checking is also tested with the same input objects: `j1` and `j2`. The manual implementation must carefully handle cases like nested properties, array values, and property order. **Pros/Cons** Here are some pros and cons for each approach: Lodash `isEqual` function: Pros: * Concise and readable code * Handles complex object structures and properties * Robust performance Cons: * Requires an additional library dependency (Lodash) * May have slower startup times due to the additional dependency Manual Equality Checking: Pros: * No dependencies or overhead * Can be more lightweight and efficient for simple cases * Allows for fine-grained control over equality checking logic Cons: * More code required, which can lead to errors or inconsistencies * Requires careful handling of complex cases like nested properties and array values **Other Considerations** When choosing between these approaches, consider the following factors: * Performance: If you need optimal performance, Lodash's `isEqual` function is likely a better choice due to its optimized implementation. * Code readability and maintainability: If code clarity is crucial, manual equality checking might be preferable, as it forces developers to carefully consider each comparison. * Library dependencies: If you're working in an environment with strict dependencies or performance constraints, the manual approach might be more suitable. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for implementing equality checking include: 1. **ES6's `===` and `==` operators**: These primitive comparisons can be used to check for basic equality, but may not handle complex cases like nested properties or array values. 2. **JSON Schema validation libraries**: Libraries like jsonschema or validator.js provide more advanced equality checking capabilities, especially for validating JSON data against schemas. 3. **Other object comparison libraries**: Other libraries like compare-obj or deep-equalize offer alternative approaches to comparing objects and arrays. These alternatives may provide different trade-offs in terms of performance, code complexity, and features, so be sure to evaluate them carefully based on your specific use case and requirements.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash.isEqual vs JSON.stringify Equality Comparison for Plain Objects
Lodash isEqual vs Lodash difference
Lodash.isEqual vs JSON.stringify Equality Comparison for 1000 length array
_.isEqual vs for loop on Number Array
JSON Stringify icx 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?