Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty vs obj.hasOwnProperty vs exists check vs 2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty vs obj.hasOwnProperty vs null check vs null check function
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
window.obj = { a: 2 }
Tests:
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(obj, 'a');
obj.hasOwnProperty
obj.hasOwnProperty('a');
null check
obj.hasOwnProperty && obj.hasOwnProperty('a');
null check function
typeof obj.hasOwnProperty === 'function' && obj.hasOwnProperty('a');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty
obj.hasOwnProperty
null check
null check function
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the benchmark. **What is being tested?** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark test case on MeasureThat.net. The test case measures the performance of different approaches to check if an object has a specific property. The benchmark tests four different methods: 1. `Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(obj, 'a')` 2. `obj.hasOwnProperty('a')` 3. `obj.hasOwnProperty && obj.hasOwnProperty('a')` 4. `typeof obj.hasOwnProperty === 'function' && obj.hasOwnProperty('a')` **Options being compared:** These options are compared to determine which approach is the fastest. 1. **`Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(obj, 'a')`**: This method uses the `hasOwnProperty` method on the object's prototype chain and checks if the specified property exists. 2. **`obj.hasOwnProperty('a')`**: This method directly calls the `hasOwnProperty` method on the object itself. 3. **`obj.hasOwnProperty && obj.hasOwnProperty('a')`**: This approach uses a null check ( `obj.hasOwnProperty` ) followed by another call to `hasOwnProperty` to ensure the property exists. 4. **`typeof obj.hasOwnProperty === 'function' && obj.hasOwnProperty('a')`**: This method checks if `hasOwnProperty` is a function before calling it. **Pros and Cons of each approach:** 1. **`Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(obj, 'a')`**: * Pros: Avoids null pointer exceptions (NPEs) by using the prototype chain. * Cons: May be slower due to the additional call on the object's prototype. 2. **`obj.hasOwnProperty('a')`**: * Pros: Simple and straightforward. * Cons: NPE risk if `obj` is null or undefined, which could lead to performance issues in some cases. 3. **`obj.hasOwnProperty && obj.hasOwnProperty('a')`**: * Pros: Combines a null check with the actual property existence check. * Cons: Adds unnecessary overhead due to the additional call on `hasOwnProperty`. 4. **`typeof obj.hasOwnProperty === 'function' && obj.hasOwnProperty('a')`**: * Pros: Checks if `hasOwnProperty` is a function, which can help avoid NPEs. * Cons: May be slower due to the additional type check. **Library and syntax considerations:** The test case uses the `window.obj` object, which suggests that this benchmark was written for a web environment where the global scope (`window`) is available. The use of `typeof obj.hasOwnProperty === 'function' && obj.hasOwnProperty('a')` implies that the test author wanted to ensure that `hasOwnProperty` is called as a function. **Special JS features and syntax:** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark definition. **Other alternatives:** Some alternative approaches that were not tested in this benchmark include: * Using `in` operator instead of `hasOwnProperty` * Using `instanceof` to check if the object is a custom instance * Using `Object.keys()` and checking for the existence of the property * Using a library like Lodash's `has` function Keep in mind that these alternative approaches might have different performance characteristics, pros, and cons compared to the methods tested in this benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty vs obj.hasOwnProperty
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty vs obj.hasOwnProperty vs exists check
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty vs obj.hasOwnProperty vs Object.hasOwn
in vs Object.hasOwn vs Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?