Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
array update push vs spread
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
push vs spread
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var array = [].fill(0, 10, 100) var array2 = [].fill(0, 20, 100)
Tests:
push
array.push(...array2)
spread
array = [...array, ...array2]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
push
spread
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark definition and test cases. **What is being tested?** MeasureThat.net is testing two approaches for updating an array: using `array.push(...array2)` and using the spread operator (`array = [...array, ...array2]`). The goal of this benchmark is to compare the performance of these two methods in updating an array with a large number of elements. **Options being compared** There are only two options being compared: 1. **`array.push(...array2)`**: This method uses the spread operator (`...`) to add all elements from `array2` to the end of `array`. The `push()` method is called on the resulting array. 2. **`array = [...array, ...array2]`**: This method uses the spread operator (`...`) to create a new array that combines `array` and `array2`, and then assigns it back to `array`. **Pros and Cons of each approach** 1. **`array.push(...array2)`**: * Pros: Simple, easy to read, and widely supported. * Cons: Can be slower than the spread operator approach due to the overhead of creating a new array in push mode. 2. **`array = [...array, ...array2]`**: * Pros: Creates a new array with improved performance compared to `push()` mode, and is generally faster. * Cons: Requires understanding of the spread operator syntax and can be less readable. **Library usage** There is no library being used in this benchmark. The test cases only involve JavaScript core functionality. **Special JS feature or syntax** The use of the spread operator (`...`) is a special JavaScript feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). It allows for creating new arrays by spreading elements from existing arrays. **Other alternatives** Before adopting either approach, it's worth noting that other methods could be used to update an array: 1. **`array.concat(array2)`**: This method creates a new array and concatenates `array` and `array2`. While not as efficient as the spread operator or push mode, it is still widely supported. 2. **`Array.prototype.splice()`**: This method updates `array` in place by replacing a portion of its elements with elements from `array2`. The choice of approach ultimately depends on the specific use case and personal preference. Keep in mind that this benchmark only tests performance, not code readability or maintainability. Depending on the context, other factors might be more important when choosing an array update method.
Related benchmarks:
array update push vs spread vs concat
Javascript: Spread vs push
JS array spread operator vs push
Spread Operator vs Push Method
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?