Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
proxy get trap benchmark 3
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
vanilla vs proxy
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
object = () => ({ variant: data => ({ variant: data }) }); proxy = () => new Proxy({}, { get(target, prop) { return data => ({ [prop]: data }) } })
Tests:
vanilla
object().variant("data")
proxy
proxy().variant("data")
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
vanilla
proxy
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Measuring the performance of JavaScript code is crucial in understanding how different approaches impact execution speed. Let's dive into the provided benchmark. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark, titled "proxy get trap benchmark 3," tests two variants: one using vanilla JavaScript and another using Proxy objects. A Proxy object allows you to customize access to an object's properties. **Options Compared** In this benchmark: 1. **Vanilla JavaScript**: The first option uses a simple object with a `variant` method that returns an object containing the input data. 2. **Proxy Object**: The second option creates a Proxy object, which is then used as a target for a get trap. When a property is accessed on the Proxy object, it returns a new object with the original data. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** ### Vanilla JavaScript Pros: * Easy to understand and implement * Familiar syntax for most developers * No additional libraries or overhead required Cons: * May not be optimized for performance * Can lead to slower execution times due to unnecessary computations ### Proxy Object Pros: * Allows for fine-grained control over property access * Can improve performance by avoiding unnecessary computations * Can be used to implement complex logic Cons: * Requires additional knowledge of Proxy objects and their usage * Can add overhead due to the creation of a new object on every access **Library Used** In this benchmark, there is no explicitly mentioned library. However, it's worth noting that the `Proxy` object is a built-in JavaScript feature. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** The "get trap" used in the Proxy object is a special syntax for handling property access. It allows you to define custom behavior when a property is accessed on an object. In this case, the get trap returns a new object with the original data. Other Alternatives If you're looking for alternative approaches or libraries to measure performance, consider: * **Benchmarking libraries**: Libraries like Benchmark.js or js-benchmark provide easy-to-use APIs for writing and running benchmarks. * **Profiling tools**: Tools like Chrome DevTools or Node.js Inspector can help you identify performance bottlenecks in your code. * **Just-In-Time (JIT) compilers**: Some JavaScript engines, like V8 in Google Chrome, use JIT compilation to optimize performance.
Related benchmarks:
Access to Proxy vs Object - without reflect
Access to Proxy without Reflect, vs Object
Proxy.get(prop) vs obj[prop]
Access to Proxy vs Object vs Getters fixed
Plain object access vs Proxy vs Property
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?