Benchmark: proxy get trap benchmark 2

Script Preparation code:

object = () => {
    variant: data => ({
        variant: data
    })
};
proxy = () => new Proxy({}, {
    get(target, prop) {
        return data => ({
            [prop]: data
        })
    }
})

Tests:

vanilla
object().variant("data")
proxy
proxy().variant("data")

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
vanilla
proxy

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark compares the performance of two JavaScript approaches: using a vanilla object (no proxy) and using a Proxy object to store data.

**Script Preparation Code**

The script preparation code defines two functions:

1. `object = () => {\r\n    variant: data => ({\r\n        variant: data\r\n    })\r\n};`: This function returns an object with a single property called `variant`, which takes a `data` parameter and returns an object with the same `data` value.
2. `proxy = () => new Proxy({}, {\r\n    get(target, prop) {\r\n        return data => ({\r\n            [prop]: data\r\n        })\r\n    }\r\n})`: This function creates a new Proxy object that listens for property access on the target object (`{}`). When a property is accessed, it returns a new object with the same value as `data`.

**Html Preparation Code**

There is no HTML preparation code provided, which means the benchmark only tests the JavaScript code itself.

**Individual Test Cases**

The two test cases are:

1. **vanilla**: This test case uses the vanilla object function defined earlier.
2. **proxy**: This test case uses the Proxy object function defined earlier.

**Comparison**

Both test cases measure the performance of accessing the `variant` property on their respective objects. The only difference is that the `proxy` test case uses a Proxy object to store data, while the `vanilla` test case uses a vanilla object.

**Pros and Cons**

* **Vanilla Object (vanilla)**:
	+ Pros: Simple and straightforward implementation.
	+ Cons: May not be optimized for performance compared to Proxy objects.
* **Proxy Object (proxy)**:
	+ Pros: Can provide more efficient access to data, as the Proxy object can cache the result of property access.
	+ Cons: Requires creating a new Proxy object instance, which may incur some overhead.

**Library/Functionality**

In this benchmark, we have:

1. `Proxy`: A built-in JavaScript object that allows you to create objects with custom behavior by specifying getter and setter functions.
2. `object()` and `proxy()`: Custom functions defined in the script preparation code to create a vanilla object or a Proxy object, respectively.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax used in this benchmark beyond what's described above (Proxy objects).

**Alternatives**

If you're looking for alternatives to this benchmark, you might consider:

1. **Benchmarking frameworks**: Tools like BenchmarkJS, JsPerf, or Microbenchmark can provide more comprehensive and customizable benchmarking capabilities.
2. **Alternative Proxy implementations**: Depending on your needs, you might want to explore other Proxy implementations, such as `Proxy` in other browsers or libraries that offer similar functionality.

Keep in mind that this is a simplified example designed specifically for MeasureThat.net, so the scope of alternatives might be limited compared to more comprehensive benchmarking frameworks.

Related benchmarks:

proxy get trap benchmark 2 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: vanilla vs proxy

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

vanilla

proxy

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):