Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash.isEqual vs JSON.stringify Equality Comparison for deep objects.
(version: 0)
Test on isEqual performance
Comparing performance of:
_.isEqual vs JSON.stringify
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.4/lodash.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
window.foo = { a: { b: ['cat', 'dog', 'bird']}, c: { d: [42, '42', { val: true}]}}; window.bar = { a: { b: ['cat', 'dog', 'bird']}, c: { d: [42, '42', { val: null}]}};
Tests:
_.isEqual
_.isEqual(window.foo, window.bar)
JSON.stringify
JSON.stringify(window.foo) === JSON.stringify(window.bar);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
_.isEqual
JSON.stringify
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the explanation of the provided benchmark. **Benchmark Purpose:** The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two approaches for equality comparison on deep objects: 1. Using Lodash's `_.isEqual` function. 2. Using `JSON.stringify` and comparing the resulting strings. **Options Compared:** * **Lodash's _.isEqual**: This function is part of the Lodash library, which is a popular utility library for JavaScript. It provides various functions to manipulate data structures, including equality checks. * **JSON.stringify + Comparison**: This approach uses the `JSON.stringify` method to convert both objects into strings and then compares these strings for equality. **Pros and Cons:** 1. **Lodash's _.isEqual**: * Pros: + Efficient and optimized for deep object comparison. + Handles complex data structures, such as nested arrays and objects. + Easy to use and understand. * Cons: + Requires an additional library (Lodash) to be included in the test environment. 2. **JSON.stringify + Comparison**: * Pros: + Lightweight and doesn't require any external libraries. + Fast and simple implementation. * Cons: + May not work correctly for complex data structures or custom objects. + Can produce false positives or negatives due to differences in string representation. **Library:** The `JSON.stringify` method is a built-in JavaScript function that converts an object into a JSON string. It's used to compare the string representations of two objects. **Special JS Feature/Syntax:** None mentioned explicitly, but note that Lodash's _.isEqual uses internal optimizations and custom comparisons for specific data types (e.g., dates, regular expressions). **Other Alternatives:** * **Recursion**: You can implement a recursive function to compare two objects. This approach would work similarly to `JSON.stringify + Comparison`, but with more overhead due to the repeated calls. * **Object Prototypal Inheritance**: Another alternative is to use object prototypal inheritance to create a custom comparison function that traverses both objects simultaneously, comparing their properties recursively. **Benchmark Preparation:** The benchmark preparation code sets up two test objects, `window.foo` and `window.bar`, which are used as inputs for the test cases. The Lodash library is included in the HTML document using a CDN link. Overall, this benchmark provides a fair comparison between two approaches to equality checking on deep objects, allowing users to evaluate performance trade-offs and choose the best approach for their specific use case.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash.isEqual vs JSON.stringify Equality Comparison for Shallow Array of Strings.
Lodash.isEqual vs JSON.stringify Equality Comparison for Shallow Array of Strings when comparison is not equal.
Lodash.isEqual vs JSON.stringify Equality Comparison for Shallow Array of Strings. Testing 123
Lodash.isEqual vs JSON.stringify Equality Comparison for Shallow Object of Strings.
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?