Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
ES2019 Omit versus _.omit lodash
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
es2019 vs Lodash
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var obj = {a: {b: {c: {d: 1}}}} var badObj = {}
Tests:
es2019
const obj = { a: 1, b: 1, c: 1, d: 1, e: 1, f: 1, }; const { a, d, c, ...rest } = obj;
Lodash
const obj = { a: 1, b: 1, c: 1, d: 1, e: 1, f: 1, }; _.omit(obj, ['a', 'd', 'c']);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
es2019
Lodash
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net! The provided benchmark definition is testing two approaches to removing properties from an object: the ES2019 "rest" syntax and Lodash's `_.omit` function. **ES2019 "Rest" Syntax** In this approach, we're using the new "rest" syntax (introduced in ES2015, but gaining popularity since ES2019) to destructure the object. We define an object `obj` with multiple properties, and then use destructuring assignment to extract only certain properties into separate variables (`a`, `d`, and `c`) while discarding the rest of the properties. The benefits of this approach are: * Lightweight: This method is relatively simple and doesn't require any additional libraries. * Fast: Since it's a built-in feature, it should be just as fast as using Lodash's `_omit`. However, there are some potential drawbacks to consider: * Compatibility: As the syntax was introduced in ES2015, older browsers or environments might not support it out of the box. * Clarity: Depending on the context and complexity of your codebase, this method may be less readable than using a more explicit library. **Lodash's `_omit` Function** In contrast, Lodash's `_omit` function takes an object and an array of properties to remove. This approach requires including the Lodash library in your test script. The benefits of this approach are: * Flexibility: By removing any number of properties from the object using a simple API, you can make it more reusable across various use cases. * Well-documented: As part of the popular Lodash library, this function is well-maintained and widely recognized by developers. However, there are some potential drawbacks to consider: * Weight: You'll need to include an additional library in your test script, which can be a minor overhead. * Dependence on external libraries: If you're not prepared for potential issues with compatibility or versioning, this method requires Lodash to work properly. **Other Considerations** * Browser performance differences might arise due to the inclusion of an extra JavaScript file (Lodash) in the test script. This could have minor performance implications. * In some cases, you may need to use multiple libraries together if they offer complementary functionality. **Library and Special JS Features Used** * Lodash is a popular utility library for functional programming tasks. * No special JavaScript features or syntax are explicitly mentioned in the benchmark definition.
Related benchmarks:
lodash.keys vs Object.keys
ES6 Optional Chaining vs. ES6 Optional Chaining vs. Lodash _.get
ES6 Optional Chaining vs TS Optional Chaining result in javascript vs vs. Lodash _.get
isEmpty vs Object.keys
Lodash _.has vs Optional Chaining
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?