Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
array.push vs object literal vs array literal
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
array.push vs object literal
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var props = { x: 1, y: 2, onClick: () => {}, onMouseDown: () => {}, onMouseUp: () => {}, visible: false }
Tests:
array.push
const a = [] Object.keys(props).forEach(it => { a.push('x', props[it]) })
object literal
const a = {} if (props.x != null) { a.x = props.x } if (props.y != null) { a.y = props.y } if (props.alpha != null) { a.alpha = props.alpha } if ('onClick' in props) { a.onClick = props.onClick } if ('onMouseDown' in props) { a.onMouseDown = props.onMouseDown } if ('onMouseUp' in props) { a.onMouseUp = props.onMouseUp } if ('visible' in props) { a.visible = props.visible }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
array.push
object literal
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its test cases. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition represents three different approaches to achieve the same result: 1. `array.push`: This approach uses the `push` method of an array to add elements to it. In this case, the array is initialized with two properties: `x` and `y`, which are populated with values from the `props` object. 2. `object literal`: This approach creates a new object literal (i.e., an object defined using curly brackets `{}`) and assigns its properties directly to it. The properties are also populated with values from the `props` object. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares the performance of these two approaches: * **Pros of array.push:** + Easy to implement, as it's a familiar method for many developers. + Might be faster due to the optimized implementation in V8 (the JavaScript engine used by most modern browsers). * **Cons of array.push:** + Requires an extra step to initialize the array before using `push`. + May involve more memory allocation and garbage collection, as arrays are mutable objects. **Pros of object literal:** * **Easy to implement**, as it's a concise way to create an object with named properties. * Might be faster due to the optimized implementation in V8 (some benchmarks suggest that object literals can be slower than array push, but this is still a topic of debate). **Cons of object literal:** * Requires knowledge of object literal syntax and property assignment. * May involve more overhead due to the creation of a new object. **Library/Feature Usage** There are no notable libraries or features used in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that some modern browsers may optimize `object literal` construction using techniques like "static typing" or "property lookup," which could affect performance. **Special JS Features/Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in the benchmark definition. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, here are a few options: 1. Using an array constructor (`new Array()`) instead of `[]` to initialize the array. 2. Using the spread operator (`[...props]`) to create a new array from the `props` object's properties. 3. Using a library like Lodash or Underscore.js, which provide utility functions for working with arrays and objects. Keep in mind that these alternatives might introduce additional overhead or complexity, so it's essential to consider your specific use case and performance requirements before experimenting with different approaches.
Related benchmarks:
Array Push vs. Index Access
array.push array literal
Array .push() vs .unshift() |
Array.prototype.push vs Array.prototype.shift
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?