Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Example
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Create Element vs Inner HTML vs Simple Test
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Create Element
let outer = document.createElement('div'); for(let i=0; i<10000; i++){ const inner = document.createElement('div'); outer.appendChild(inner); } document.body.appendChild(outer);
Inner HTML
let outer = '<div>'; for(let i=0; i<10000; i++){ outer += '<div></div>'; } outer += '</div>'; document.body.innerHTML = outer;
Simple Test
for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++){ }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Create Element
Inner HTML
Simple Test
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain what's being tested in the provided JSON benchmark. **Overview** MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks, which are small programs designed to measure the performance of specific aspects of JavaScript code. The benchmark in question consists of three test cases: "Create Element", "Inner HTML", and "Simple Test". **Test Cases** 1. **Create Element**: This test case creates a new `div` element 10,000 times using the `document.createElement()` method and appends it to another `div` element. The benchmark measures how fast this process can be repeated. 2. **Inner HTML**: This test case starts with an initial string containing only a single `div` tag. It then repeatedly appends more `div` tags to the inner HTML of that initial string, using the `+=` operator. Finally, it sets the entire inner HTML to the modified string and appends the final closing `div` tag. The benchmark measures how fast this process can be repeated. 3. **Simple Test**: This test case is essentially empty and does nothing. It's likely included as a baseline or placeholder to ensure that the benchmarking framework is working correctly. **Comparison of Options** The three test cases demonstrate different approaches to creating elements in JavaScript: * **Create Element**: Uses `document.createElement()` to create new elements, which can be slower than using a string literal (e.g., `<div>`) and manipulating it directly. * **Inner HTML**: Uses the `+=` operator to concatenate more `div` tags to an existing inner HTML string. This approach is likely faster than creating individual elements and appending them one by one, as it avoids the overhead of DOM manipulation. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: * **Create Element**: Pros: + More control over element creation + Can be used when specific attributes or styles need to be applied Cons: + May be slower due to DOM manipulation * **Inner HTML**: Pros: + Faster than creating individual elements and appending them one by one + Easy to manage multiple elements with the same properties Cons: + Less control over element creation + May lead to performance issues if not implemented carefully **Libraries and Special Features** There are no libraries mentioned in this benchmark. However, some JavaScript features that may be relevant include: * **Template literals**: Used in the "Inner HTML" test case for creating a string with multiple elements. Template literals provide a concise way to create strings with embedded expressions. * **DOM manipulation**: All three test cases involve manipulating the Document Object Model (DOM) in some way. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, here are some options: * **Use a virtual DOM library**: Libraries like React or Virtual DOM can provide optimized DOM manipulation and reduce overhead. However, this may add additional complexity to your code. * **Use a CSS-in-JS solution**: Solutions like styled-components or emotion allow you to write CSS in JavaScript, which can simplify element creation and styling. Keep in mind that the best approach will depend on your specific use case and requirements.
Related benchmarks:
Unique via Set vs Filter
Word width calculation speed
test jsss
7894549846549843546846549844
jQuery $.each() vs Array.prototype.forEach()
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?