Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Remove from array (splice or concat)
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
splice vs concat
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
splice
let arr = ['foo', 'bar', 'baz', 'foo1', 'bar1', 'baz1', 'foo2', 'bar2', 'baz2']; arr = arr.slice(); const ret = arr.splice(3, 1);
concat
let arr = ['foo', 'bar', 'baz', 'foo1', 'bar1', 'baz1', 'foo2', 'bar2', 'baz2']; arr = arr.slice(); const ret = arr.slice(0, 3).concat(arr.slice(4));
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
splice
concat
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested. The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches: using `splice()` or using `slice()` followed by `concat()`. The script preparation code and HTML preparation code are empty, which means that the test only focuses on the JavaScript code. **Test Cases** There are two individual test cases: 1. **splice**: This test case creates an array `arr` with 9 elements, removes one element from the beginning of the array using `splice(3, 1)`, and stores the result in a variable `ret`. 2. **concat**: This test case creates an array `arr` with 9 elements, removes one element from the beginning of the array using `slice(0, 3)` (which returns a new array with the first 3 elements), concatenates this new array with another array created by taking the remaining elements of `arr` using `slice(4)`, and stores the result in a variable `ret`. **Library Usage** Neither test case uses any external libraries. The `splice()` and `concat()` methods are built-in JavaScript functions. **Special JavaScript Features/Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these test cases. They only rely on standard JavaScript operations (array creation, indexing, slicing, and concatenation). **Approaches Compared** The two approaches being compared are: 1. **splice**: This approach removes the element to be removed from the original array using `splice()`. 2. **concat(): slice().concat()**: This approach creates a new array by taking the first 3 elements of the original array using `slice(0, 3)`, concatenates this new array with another array created by taking the remaining elements of the original array using `slice(4)`. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: **splice** Pros: * More efficient for small arrays, as it modifies the original array in-place. * Can be faster when removing elements from the beginning of an array. Cons: * Modifies the original array, which may not be desirable if the array needs to remain unchanged. * Can cause issues with indices of subsequent elements, as the array size changes. **concat(): slice().concat()** Pros: * Creates a new array without modifying the original array. * Preserves the original array's integrity and indices. Cons: * More memory-intensive, as it creates two new arrays. * May be slower for large arrays due to the overhead of creating new arrays. **Considerations** When choosing between `splice()` and `concat(): slice().concat()`, consider the following factors: * The size and structure of your data: For small arrays or when removing elements from the beginning, `splice()` might be a better choice. For larger arrays or when preserving the original array's integrity, `concat(): slice().concat()` might be more suitable. * Performance: Measure the execution times for both approaches to determine which one is faster in your specific use case. **Other Alternatives** There are other alternatives you can consider: 1. **Array.prototype.at()**: Introduced in ECMAScript 2019, this method allows you to access elements at a specific index without creating new arrays. 2. **Array.prototype.slice()` with `...`: Using the spread operator (`...`) can create a new array while preserving the original array's indices. 3. **Iterating over the array**: You can use `for...of` loops or `Array.prototype.forEach()` to remove elements from an array without modifying it. Keep in mind that these alternatives might have different performance characteristics, so test them thoroughly to determine which one best fits your needs.
Related benchmarks:
delete a element and return new array with slice vs splice
spread vs concat vs unshift vs splice
Splice vs shift to remove at beginning of array (fixed from slice)
Array splice vs delete
Getting/Keeping only the first item of an array: length VS splice VS slice
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?