Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
destruct, object vs func
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
OR Object vs OR Function vs OR func ok vs Or obj ok
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
OR Object
const props = {} const defaultLatestReturn = { __typename: '', carrierReturnOrderNumbers: null, endTime: null, key: '', orderLines: [], paymentType: null, pickupDate: null, returnMethod: null, startTime: null, status: '', }; const { latestReturn } = props; const { status } = latestReturn || defaultLatestReturn;
OR Function
const props = {} const defaultLatestReturnFunc = () => ({ __typename: '', carrierReturnOrderNumbers: null, endTime: null, key: '', orderLines: [], paymentType: null, pickupDate: null, returnMethod: null, startTime: null, status: '', }); const { latestReturn } = props; const { status } = latestReturn || defaultLatestReturnFunc();
OR func ok
const props = { latestReturn: {} } const defaultLatestReturnFunc = () => ({ __typename: '', carrierReturnOrderNumbers: null, endTime: null, key: '', orderLines: [], paymentType: null, pickupDate: null, returnMethod: null, startTime: null, status: '', }); const { latestReturn } = props; const { status } = latestReturn || defaultLatestReturnFunc();
Or obj ok
const props = { latestReturn: {} } const defaultLatestReturn = { __typename: '', carrierReturnOrderNumbers: null, endTime: null, key: '', orderLines: [], paymentType: null, pickupDate: null, returnMethod: null, startTime: null, status: '', }; const { latestReturn } = props; const { status } = latestReturn || defaultLatestReturn;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
OR Object
OR Function
OR func ok
Or obj ok
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
The provided benchmark tests the performance of three different approaches to access and evaluate an object's properties: using an object literal, a function expression, and a hybrid approach that uses an object literal with a default value. **Object Literal (OR Object)**: ```javascript const props = {}; const defaultLatestReturn = { // ... }; const { latestReturn } = props; const { status } = latestReturn || defaultLatestReturn; ``` This approach creates an object `props` and assigns it to the variable `latestReturn`. The expression `latestReturn || defaultLatestReturn` checks if `latestReturn` is truthy; if not, it returns the value of `defaultLatestReturn`. Pros: * Easy to read and understand * No overhead of function call or closure creation Cons: * Can lead to unnecessary computations if `latestReturn` is falsy * May result in slower performance compared to other approaches **Function Expression (OR Function)**: ```javascript const defaultLatestReturnFunc = () => { // ... }; const props = { latestReturn: {} }; const { latestReturn } = props; const { status } = latestReturn || defaultLatestReturnFunc(); ``` This approach defines a function `defaultLatestReturnFunc` and assigns it to the variable `latestReturn`. The expression `latestReturn || defaultLatestReturnFunc()` checks if `latestReturn` is truthy; if not, it calls the function and returns its result. Pros: * Can be optimized for performance by using caching or memoization * Allows for easier error handling and debugging Cons: * More complex to read and understand compared to object literal approach * Requires a function call overhead **Hybrid Approach (OR func ok)**: ```javascript const defaultLatestReturn = { // ... }; const props = { latestReturn: {} }; const { latestReturn } = props; const { status } = latestReturn || defaultLatestReturn; ``` This approach is similar to the object literal approach but uses a function expression with a default value. Pros: * Combines the benefits of both approaches (easier to read and understand, yet optimized for performance) * Allows for easy error handling and debugging Cons: * May be less intuitive than other approaches * Requires a slight performance overhead compared to pure object literal approach **Library Used:** In this benchmark, it appears that no external libraries are used. However, the test cases involve objects with nested properties, which is a common pattern in JavaScript applications. **Special JS Feature or Syntax:** None mentioned.
Related benchmarks:
Delete vs destructure for objects
Delete vs destructure for cloned objects
Delete vs destructure for objects v2 2
Delete vs destructure for objects without mutating-23
Delete vs destructure for objects without mutating 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?