Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Add value in the first position ofan array
(version: 0)
Two ways to add a value in the first position of an array.
Comparing performance of:
Unshift vs Concat
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var aNumbers = [0,1,2,3];
Tests:
Unshift
aNumbers.unshift(4)
Concat
[4].concat(aNumbers)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Unshift
Concat
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and its components. **Benchmark Definition:** The benchmark measures how fast two approaches are to add a value in the first position of an array. The arrays are defined as `aNumbers = [0,1,2,3];`. **Options Compared:** Two options are compared: 1. **Unshift**: This method adds a new element to the beginning of the array. 2. **Concat**: This method creates a new array by concatenating the original array with the value to be added. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach:** **Unshift:** Pros: * Efficient, as it only requires updating the internal array structure. * Can be faster for small arrays or when adding many elements at once. Cons: * May cause unnecessary reallocations of memory if the original array is large. * Can be slower than concat() for very large arrays due to overhead in handling boundary checks. **Concat:** Pros: * Generally faster for large arrays, as it avoids reallocation and uses a more efficient allocation strategy. * Easier to implement and understand for some developers. Cons: * Creates a new array object, which can be slower than updating the original array with unshift(). * More memory-intensive due to the creation of a new array. **Library Usage:** None of the test cases use any external libraries. Both options rely on built-in JavaScript methods (`unshift()` and `concat()`). **Special JS Features/Syntax:** None are explicitly mentioned or required for these two test cases. However, keep in mind that modern JavaScript versions (e.g., ECMAScript 2015+) introduced more efficient array methods like `set()`, which might be worth exploring in other benchmarks. **Other Alternatives:** For adding a value to the first position of an array, some developers may also consider using: 1. **Array.prototype.set(index, value)** (ECMAScript 2019+): This method can set the element at a specific index without shifting elements. 2. **Splice()**: While not directly applicable for the first position, splice() can be used to add a new element and shift existing ones. However, in this specific benchmark, the focus is on comparing unshift() with concat(), which are the most common approaches. Now that you've taken a deep breath, I hope this explanation helps!
Related benchmarks:
Splice vs Spread vs Unshift to insert at beginning of array
Splice vs Spread vs Unshift to insert at beginning of array (fixed from slice)
Splice vs Spread vs Unshift vs Push to insert at beginning of array
Splice vs shift to remove at beginning of array (fixed from slice)
Splice vs Shift to remove from the beginning
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?