Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
takeLast
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Ramda vs JS
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.26.1/ramda.min.js'></script>
Tests:
Ramda
const arr = [1,2,3] const lastAsArr = R.takeLast(1, arr)
JS
const arr = [1,2,3] const lastAsArr = [arr[arr.length-1]]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Ramda
JS
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided JSON data and explain what's being tested, compared, and the pros and cons of each approach. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is the code that defines how to create a test case. In this case, there are two benchmark definitions: 1. `"const arr = [1,2,3]\r\nconst lastAsArr = R.takeLast(1, arr)"` - This code uses Ramda's `takeLast` function to extract the last element of an array. 2. `"const arr = [1,2,3]\r\nconst lastAsArr = [arr[arr.length-1]]"` - This code extracts the last element of an array using a simple indexing approach. **Script Preparation Code and Html Preparation Code** The script preparation code is used to load any necessary libraries before running the benchmark. In this case, it loads Ramda's `ramda.min.js` library. The html preparation code includes a script tag that loads the same library. **Options Compared** The two test cases compare two approaches to extract the last element of an array: 1. Using Ramda's `takeLast` function (Benchmark Definition 1). 2. Using a simple indexing approach (Benchmark Definition 2). **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** **Ramda's `takeLast` function:** Pros: * More concise and expressive code * Reduces chance of errors due to off-by-one indexing * Tightly coupled with the array data structure Cons: * May have a higher overhead due to the need for an external library (Ramda) * Limited control over the indexing process **Simple Indexing Approach:** Pros: * Lightweight and easy to understand * Provides direct access to the last element of the array * No external dependencies required Cons: * More prone to off-by-one errors * May lead to longer execution times due to the need for additional calculations (index calculation) **Library: Ramda** Ramda is a popular functional programming library for JavaScript. Its `takeLast` function provides a concise way to extract elements from an array, and it's often used in data processing and manipulation tasks. In this benchmark, Ramda is used to compare its performance against the simple indexing approach. **Special JS Feature or Syntax: None** There are no special features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing two different approaches to extract an element from an array. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative ways to extract the last element of an array, here are a few options: 1. Using `Array.prototype.pop()`: This method removes and returns the last element of the array. 2. Using `Array.prototype.slice()`: This method returns a new array with the last elements extracted from the original array. 3. Using `map()` and `reduce()`: You can use these methods to extract the last element of an array, but this approach may have higher overhead due to the need for additional calculations. Keep in mind that these alternatives may not provide the same level of performance as Ramda's `takeLast` function or the simple indexing approach.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.map vs. Ramda.map
Array.prototype.map vs Ramda.map
lodash includes vs ramda includes
Lodash vs Ramda fromPairs
Lodash vs Ramda vs Native fromPairs
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?