Benchmark: xeaiow test - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var data = [
  {
    "id": 1,
    "firstName": "Devin",
    "myFirstNameLength": 5,
    "lastName": "Olson",
    "Olson": "is my family name",
    "fullName": "Devin Olson",
    "nickName": "凡人",
    "chineseName": "苗叶黛",
    "children": [
      "Dylan"
    ],
    "favouriteChild": "Dylan",
    "age": 43,
    "to100": 57,
    "telephone": "14656814591",
    "avatar": "http://llss.qiniudn.com/d11acfab711e373a7d763bbdc4d0f4a97.jpg",
    "others": {
      "objectInArray": [
        {
          "a": 43,
          "b": "18292806320"
        }
      ],
      "getSystemConfig": "(ง •̀_•́)ง",
      "words": "Hello, my name is Devin Olson, you can call me 凡人.",
      "bestFriends": "慕晓, 000(香盈袖)"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": 2,
    "firstName": "Herbert",
    "myFirstNameLength": 7,
    "lastName": "Pratt",
    "Pratt": "is my family name",
    "fullName": "Herbert Pratt",
    "nickName": "Kelly-Jyi",
    "chineseName": "谢酆娅婷",
    "children": [
      "Laura",
      "Cameron",
      "Chris"
    ],
    "favouriteChild": "Laura",
    "age": 23,
    "to100": 77,
    "telephone": "13232602270",
    "avatar": "http://llss.qiniudn.com/d282009ed5d75d0701c08ea065cf206b5.jpg",
    "others": {
      "objectInArray": [
        {
          "a": 23,
          "b": "18890854571"
        }
      ],
      "getSystemConfig": "✌(-‿-)✌",
      "words": "Hello, my name is Herbert Pratt, you can call me Kelly-Jyi.",
      "bestFriends": "Bean, Sofer, 　 清自定"
    }
  }
];

Tests:

lodash
_.forEach(data, (equipment, index) => { ( { index, label: equipment.myFirstNameLength, value: equipment.chineseName } ) })
native
data.map((equipment, index) => { ( { index, label: equipment.myFirstNameLength, value: equipment.chineseName } ) })

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
lodash
native

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'll break down the provided benchmark information and explain what's being tested, the options compared, their pros and cons, and other considerations.

**Benchmark Definition JSON**

The benchmark definition json represents two test cases:

1. **Lodash**: This test case uses the `_` symbol (a shortcut for Lodash) to execute a function that iterates over the `data` array using `_.forEach()`. The goal is to measure the performance of this function.
2. **Native**: This test case uses native JavaScript syntax to achieve the same result as the Lodash version, but with a different implementation using `map()` and an arrow function.

**Options Compared**

Both options use an object creation expression to create objects for each item in the `data` array, where each object contains:

* `index`: the index of the current item
* `label`: the value of the `myFirstNameLength` property
* `value`: the value of the `chineseName` property

The main difference between the two options is the method used to iterate over the array and create these objects.

**Pros and Cons**

**Lodash:**

Pros:

* Simplifies the iteration logic using a concise syntax.
* Provides a robust and widely-used utility library for JavaScript.

Cons:

* Requires loading an additional library (Lodash) due to the `_.forEach()` call.
* May have overhead from the library's execution and garbage collection.

**Native:**

Pros:

* Does not require loading any external libraries.
* Uses native JavaScript syntax, which may be more familiar to some developers.

Cons:

* Requires a more verbose iteration logic using `map()` and an arrow function.
* May be less efficient or more prone to errors compared to the Lodash version.

**Other Considerations**

Both options use object creation expressions to create objects with dynamic properties (`index`, `label`, and `value`). This approach allows for concise and expressive code, but may also introduce overhead due to the creation of new objects on each iteration.

**Library: Lodash**

Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for tasks such as string manipulation, array processing, and more. In this case, `_` symbol is used as a shortcut for the `_.forEach()` function, which applies a provided function to each element in an array.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

Neither option uses any special JavaScript features or syntax that would require additional explanation. However, it's worth noting that the use of arrow functions (`=>`) and template literals (`\r\n` is escaped to `\r\n`) are common in modern JavaScript code and do not introduce any unusual concepts.

**Alternative Benchmarks**

Other alternatives for this benchmark could include:

* Using a different utility library (e.g., Underscore.js or Ramda)
* Implementing the iteration logic using a different data structure (e.g., `forEach` loop with an index variable)
* Measuring the performance of a custom implementation that uses a different algorithm or approach.

Keep in mind that the choice of benchmark and testing strategy depends on the specific goals and requirements of the project, as well as the target audience and expected outcomes.

Related benchmarks:

xeaiow test (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: lodash vs native

Created: 5 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

lodash

native

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):