Benchmark: Boolean vs !! - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:

var newArr = ['1', '2', '3', '4'];

Tests:

Test1
!!newArr.length
Test2
Boolean(newArr.length)

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 185 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 147 runs

Test1

28.8M/s

Test2

11.2M/s

Fastest: Test1 (2.6x faster)

View exact numbers

✓ Test1: 28,790,508 ops/sec
• Test2: 11,169,409 ops/sec

Firefox 27 runs

Test2

1326.2M/s

Test1

1304.2M/s

View exact numbers

✓ Test2: 1,326,150,016 ops/sec
• Test1: 1,304,182,912 ops/sec

Safari 6 runs

Test1

35.2M/s

Test2

14.0M/s

Fastest: Test1 (2.5x faster)

View exact numbers

✓ Test1: 35,206,108 ops/sec
• Test2: 14,028,338 ops/sec

Mobile Results:

Safari 5 runs

Test2

280.0M/s

Test1

262.8M/s

View exact numbers

✓ Test2: 279,974,208 ops/sec
• Test1: 262,813,632 ops/sec

Results show median performance across all community submissions. Run this benchmark yourself to verify on your device.

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Test1
Test2

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one month ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/149.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 149 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test1

329.2M/s

Test2

327.8M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Test1	329,239,456 Ops/sec
Test2	327,785,984 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided JSON data for MeasureThat.net, a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark definition is provided in two parts:

1. **Script Preparation Code**: This section defines an array `newArr` containing four string elements: `'1'`, `'2'`, `'3'`, and `'4'`. This code is executed before each test case.
2. **Html Preparation Code**: There is no HTML preparation code provided, which means that the benchmark only runs in a headless environment, without displaying any UI.

**Individual Test Cases**

There are two individual test cases:

1. `!!newArr.length`: This test case measures the performance of the double-bang operator (`!!`) used with the length property of the array `newArr`. The `!!` operator is a shorthand for `Boolean(value)`, where `value` is evaluated as a boolean.
2. `Boolean(newArr.length)`: This test case measures the performance of the `Boolean()` function applied to the length property of the array `newArr`.

**Options Compared**

The two test cases compare the performance of using the double-bang operator (`!!`) versus the explicit `Boolean()` function with the `length` property.

**Pros and Cons**

1. **Double-Bang Operator (`!!`)**:
	* Pros: concise, readable, and often faster than explicit `Boolean()`.
	* Cons: may be less intuitive for developers who are not familiar with this syntax.
2. **Explicit `Boolean()`**:
	* Pros: clear and easy to understand, especially for developers who are new to JavaScript.
	* Cons: may be slightly slower due to the additional function call.

**Library**

There is no library used in these test cases.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

The double-bang operator (`!!`) is a shorthand syntax for `Boolean(value)`. It was introduced in ECMAScript 2008 and has since become a common idiom in JavaScript.

**Other Alternatives**

If you want to compare the performance of other ways to evaluate an expression, you could consider adding additional test cases:

* Using `new Boolean(expression)` (explicit boolean constructor)
* Using `true`/`false` directly (e.g., `if (expression)`)
* Using a conditional statement with an empty body (e.g., `if (!expression) { }`)

Keep in mind that the performance impact of these alternatives may be negligible, and MeasureThat.net is primarily focused on comparing the performance of different ways to write the same code.

Boolean vs !! (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: `Test1 vs Test2`

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Test1

Test2

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 185 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 147 runs

Firefox 27 runs

Safari 6 runs

Mobile Results:

Safari 5 runs

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Boolean vs !! (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Test1 vs Test2

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Test1

Test2

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 185 community runs

Desktop Results:

Chrome 147 runs

Firefox 27 runs

Safari 6 runs

Mobile Results:

Safari 5 runs

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Test1 vs Test2`