Benchmark: Object.keys vs lodash _.keys

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/lodash/4.16.0/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var value = {a: 30310, b: '100303', c: '3040494'}

Tests:

_.keys with map
_.keys(value).map( function(key){ return {value: _.camelCase(key), label: _.startCase(key)}} )
native with map
Object.keys(value).map( function(key){ return {value: _.camelCase(key), label: _.startCase(key)}} )
native with forEach
var arr = [] Object.keys(value).forEach( function(key){ return arr.push({value: _.camelCase(key), label: _.startCase(key)}) } )

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
_.keys with map
native with map
native with forEach

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 17_1_2 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/17.1.2 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1

Browser/OS: Mobile Safari 17 on iOS 17.1.2

View result in a separate tab

native with map

327K/s

_.keys with map

327K/s

native with forEach

311K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ native with map	326,928 Ops/sec
_.keys with map	326,776 Ops/sec
native with forEach	311,067 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks and explore what's being tested on MeasureThat.net.

**What is being tested?**

The provided JSON represents three test cases that compare different approaches to extract keys from an object and perform some operations on them. The tests are:

1. Using `Object.keys()` with `map()`.
2. Using Lodash's `_keys()` function with `map()`.
3. Using the native `forEach()` method.

**Options compared:**

The three test cases compare the performance of different methods to extract keys from an object and perform some operations on them:

* **Lodash's _keys()`**: A popular JavaScript utility library that provides a set of functions for functional programming.
* **Native Object.keys()**: The built-in `Object.keys()` method in JavaScript, which returns an array of strings containing the property names of an object.
* **Native forEach()**: The native `forEach()` method, which applies a provided function to each element in an array.

**Pros and Cons:**

Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach:

1. Lodash's `_keys()`:
	* Pros:
		+ More concise and expressive code.
		+ Easier to use for complex transformations.
	* Cons:
		+ Adds an external dependency (Lodash).
		+ May have a slight performance overhead due to the additional function call.
2. Native Object.keys():
	* Pros:
		+ Built-in and available on all platforms.
		+ No dependencies or overhead.
	* Cons:
		+ May require more boilerplate code for transformations.
3. Native forEach():
	* Pros:
		+ Fast and efficient, since it's a native method.
		+ Can be used with arrays or objects (not just arrays).
	* Cons:
		+ Less concise and expressive than the other two options.
		+ May require additional logic to handle errors or edge cases.

**Library: Lodash**

Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a set of functions for functional programming. The `_keys()` function returns an array of strings containing the property names of an object, which can then be used as input to further transformations.

**Special JS feature: No special features are mentioned in this benchmark.**

Now, let's look at the individual test cases:

1. **_.keys() with map**: This test case uses Lodash's `_keys()` function and `map()` to transform the resulting array of keys.
2. **Native with map**: This test case uses the native `Object.keys()` method and `map()` to perform a similar transformation.
3. **Native with forEach**: This test case uses the native `forEach()` method to iterate over an array of keys.

**Other alternatives**

If you're interested in exploring other approaches, here are some alternatives:

* Use other utility libraries like Underscore.js or Ramda, which provide similar functions for working with objects and arrays.
* Implement your own solutions using JavaScript's built-in methods and syntax.
* Experiment with different transformation strategies, such as using `reduce()` or `filter()` instead of `map()`.

Object.keys vs lodash _.keys (version: 3)

Also checking the .map method on the returned array.

Comparing performance of: `_.keys with map vs native with map vs native with forEach`

Created: 9 years ago by: Registered User

Go to the latest result

_.keys with map

native with map

native with forEach

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Object.keys vs lodash _.keys (version: 3)

Also checking the .map method on the returned array.

Comparing performance of: _.keys with map vs native with map vs native with forEach

Created: 9 years ago by: Registered User

Go to the latest result

_.keys with map

native with map

native with forEach

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `_.keys with map vs native with map vs native with forEach`