Benchmark: Object.keys(obj)[0] vs for in

Script Preparation code:

var obj = {'a': 1}

Tests:

for-in
for (var i=10000; i > 0; i--) { let first for (let key in obj) { first = key break } }
Object.keys
for (var i=10000; i > 0; i--) { const first = Object.keys(obj)[0] }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
for-in
Object.keys

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 6 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Android 15; Mobile; rv:144.0) Gecko/144.0 Firefox/144.0

Browser/OS: Firefox Mobile 144 on Android

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
for-in	2493.5 Ops/sec
Object.keys	1221.4 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.

The provided JSON represents two benchmark test cases that compare the performance of two approaches to retrieve the first key of an object: `for-in` loop and using the `Object.keys()` method.

**What is being tested?**

In this case, we're testing how fast it takes to execute a loop that iterates from 10,000 to 1 (inclusive) and uses either a `for-in` loop or the `Object.keys()` method to retrieve the first key of an object. The object in question is predefined as `obj = {'a': 1}`.

**Options being compared:**

1. **For-in loop**: This approach iterates over the object's keys using a traditional `for` loop, which uses the `in` operator to get the property names.
2. **Object.keys() method**: This approach uses a built-in JavaScript method that returns an array of an object's own enumerable property names.

**Pros and cons:**

1. **For-in loop**:
	* Pros: Can be more readable and easier to understand for some developers, as it explicitly iterates over the object's keys.
	* Cons: Might be slower due to the need to iterate over all properties, which can lead to unnecessary computations.
2. **Object.keys() method**:
	* Pros: Typically faster and more efficient, as it uses a built-in method that is optimized for performance.
	* Cons: Can be less readable, as it relies on an external function to retrieve the keys.

Other considerations:

* The use of `let` instead of `var` in both test cases might affect the performance, but it's unlikely to have a significant impact in this specific benchmark.
* The object size is fixed at 1 property (`'a': 1`), which makes this benchmark more about comparing the two approaches rather than testing with larger objects.

**Libraries and special features:**

In both test cases, no external libraries are used. There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in the benchmark definition.

**Alternatives:**

To further compare the performance of these two approaches, you could consider adding more test cases, such as:

* Using a larger object with multiple properties
* Comparing the performance of `for-in` loop versus `Object.keys()` method with different data structures (e.g., arrays, maps)
* Adding additional loops or iterations to increase the complexity of the benchmark

By exploring these alternatives, you can gain a better understanding of how JavaScript engines optimize these specific use cases.

Related benchmarks:

Object.keys(obj)[0] vs for in (version: 0)

Test the performance to retrieve the first key of an object

Comparing performance of: for-in vs Object.keys

Created: 5 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

for-in

Object.keys

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):