Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash forOwn vs native Object.values and forEach
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
lodash forOwn vs Keys and then forEach
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var obj = { a: 1, b: 2, c: 3, }
Tests:
lodash forOwn
_.forOwn(obj, () => {});
Keys and then forEach
Object.values(obj).forEach(() => {});
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
lodash forOwn
Keys and then forEach
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Overview** The benchmark compares two approaches to iterate over an object: using `_.forOwn` from Lodash, and using native methods `Object.values` followed by `forEach`. **Options Compared** There are two options being compared: 1. **Lodash's `_ forOwn`**: This method calls a provided function once for each key in the specified object. 2. **Native `Object.values` + `forEach`**: This approach uses `Object.values` to get an array of the object's values, and then iterates over that array using `forEach`. **Pros and Cons** 1. **Lodash's `_ forOwn`**: * Pros: Easy to read and maintain, concise syntax. * Cons: Additional dependency on Lodash library, potentially slower due to function call overhead. 2. **Native `Object.values` + `forEach`**: * Pros: Faster execution time, no additional dependencies required. * Cons: More verbose syntax, requires more code to achieve the same result. **Other Considerations** When choosing between these two approaches, consider the following: * Performance-critical code: If speed is crucial, using native methods might be a better choice. However, in most cases, the performance difference will not be noticeable. * Code readability and maintainability: Lodash's `_ forOwn` provides a clear and concise way to iterate over objects, making it easier to understand and modify. **Library (Lodash)** Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides various functions for tasks like iteration, manipulation, and transformation. In this benchmark, Lodash's `_ forOwn` method is used to iterate over the object `obj`. **Special JS feature/Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark. **Benchmark Preparation Code** The preparation code sets up a simple object `obj` with three properties: `a`, `b`, and `c`. The HTML preparation code includes a link to Lodash's library. **Latest Benchmark Result** The latest results show that the native `Object.values + forEach` approach outperforms Lodash's `_ forOwn`. However, the actual execution times are not provided, so it's difficult to determine which approach is truly faster in this specific case.
Related benchmarks:
lodash.forOwn vs Native.forEach
lodash.each vs Object.forEach vs Native for
Lodash forOwn vs Native keys + forEach
lodash.forOwn vs for..in
big lodash vs nativejs foreach
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?