Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Print nested objects by a property
(version: 0)
This test different ways of organizing and nesting plain list that has elements nested by certain property
Comparing performance of:
orgChart() Test vs orgChartImproved() Test
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
// nested property "manager" var testInput = [{ name: "Enrique", manager: null, title: "CEO" }, { name: "Connor", manager: "Enrique", title: "Engineer" }, { name: "Ben", manager: "Enrique", title: "Engineer" }, { name: "Jeffrey", manager: "Enrique", title: "Designer" }, { name: "Lisa", manager: null, title: "COO" }, { name: "Dan", manager: "Lisa", title: "Sales Manager" }, { name: "Hannah", manager: "Dan", title: "Sales" }, { name: "Justin", manager: "Dan", title: "Sales" }, { name: "Lauren", manager: "Lisa", title: "Customer Success" }, ]; function orgChart(list) { for (let i = 0; i < list.length; i++) { const member = list[i] if (!member.manager) { console.log(getText(member)) // solve the last two console logs // I only need getParent with top managers // that reduces iterations getParent(list, member) } } } function getParent(list, member, nestLevel = 1) { for (let m = 0; m < list.length; m++) { const position = list[m] if (position.manager === member.name) { console.log(' '.repeat(4 * nestLevel) + getText(position)) getParent(list, position, nestLevel + 1) } } } function getText(member) { return `${member.name} ( ${member.title} )` } function orgChartImproved(list) { const managers = {} for (let i = 0; i < list.length; i++) { const member = list[i] if (member.manager) { if (!managers[member.manager]) { managers[member.manager] = [] } managers[member.manager].push(i) } } for (let i = 0; i < list.length; i++) { const member = list[i] if (!member.manager) { console.log(getText(member)) findNested(member, list, managers) } } } function findNested(member, data, managers, level = 1) { const nestedList = managers[member.name] if (nestedList) { nestedList.forEach((memberIdx) => { const member = data[memberIdx] console.log(' '.repeat(4 * level), getText(member)) findNested(member, data, managers, level + 1) }) } }
Tests:
orgChart() Test
orgChart(testInput)
orgChartImproved() Test
orgChartImproved(testInput)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
orgChart() Test
orgChartImproved() Test
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**What is being tested?** The provided JSON represents two JavaScript microbenchmarks, `orgChart()` and `orgChartImproved()`, which test different approaches to printing nested objects by a property. In the benchmark definition, the script preparation code contains an array of objects representing a company hierarchy, where each object has a `name` property, a `manager` property, and a `title` property. The task is to print the names and titles of all employees without direct managers (i.e., employees with no `manager` property). **Options being compared** The two benchmark functions compare different approaches to solving this problem: 1. **orgChart()**: This function uses a simple iterative approach, iterating through the entire array to find employees with no manager. 2. **orgChartImproved()**: This function uses a more efficient approach by first grouping employees by their managers and then recursively printing the names and titles of nested employees. **Pros and Cons** 1. **orgChart()**: * Pros: Simple, easy to understand, and well-suited for small inputs. * Cons: Inefficient for large inputs, as it iterates through the entire array multiple times. 2. **orgChartImproved()**: * Pros: More efficient for large inputs, as it uses a tree-like structure to reduce iterations. * Cons: Requires more complex data structures and recursive function calls. **Other considerations** 1. **Memory usage**: `orgChartImproved()` may require more memory to store the managers-employees map, which can impact performance on limited resources. 2. **Cache locality**: The recursive nature of `orgChartImproved()` may lead to poor cache locality, as the same sub-problems are re-computed multiple times. **Libraries and special features** There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, it's worth noting that `orgChartImproved()` uses a simple object map (`managers`) to store employee-manager relationships, which can be seen as a basic implementation of a data structure (e.g., a hash table). **Special JS features or syntax** There are no explicit references to special JavaScript features or syntax in the benchmark definition. **Alternatives** Other approaches to solving this problem might include: 1. **Using `forEach()` and `map()`**: Instead of recursive functions, one could use `forEach()` and `map()` to iterate through the array and print employee information. 2. **Using a queue-based approach**: Another approach would be to use a queue (e.g., a linked list) to process employees in a level-by-level manner. 3. **Using a graph library**: If the problem were more complex, with multiple layers of nested relationships between employees, using a dedicated graph library could provide a more efficient solution. These alternatives might offer trade-offs in terms of performance, memory usage, and code complexity compared to the `orgChartImproved()` approach.
Related benchmarks:
Non insensitive sorting
reduce vs map and filter
Group by single pass vs multiple
for const comparison
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?