Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Optional chaining vs manual chaining vs loop chaining vs try catch
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Optional chaining vs Manual chaining vs Loop chaining vs Try/Catch
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Optional chaining
const dataObject = {some: {deep: {hidden: {value: 1}}}}; for (let temp, i = 0; i < 10000; i +=1) { temp = dataObject?.some?.deep?.hidden?.value; temp = dataObject?.some?.deep?.black?.magic; }
Manual chaining
const dataObject = {some: {deep: {hidden: {value: 1}}}}; for (let temp, i = 0; i < 10000; i +=1) { temp = dataObject && dataObject.some && dataObject.some.deep && dataObject.some.deep.hidden && dataObject.some.deep.hidden.value; temp = dataObject && dataObject.some && dataObject.some.deep && dataObject.some.deep.black && dataObject.some.deep.black.magic; }
Loop chaining
const dataObject = {some: {deep: {hidden: {value: 1}}}}; function get(obj, steps) { let value = obj; for (let i = 0, l = steps.length; i < l; i += 1) { if (value && steps[i] in value) { value = value[steps[i]]; continue; } return undefined; } return value; } const path1 = ['dataObject', 'some', 'deep', 'hidden', 'value']; const path2 = ['dataObject', 'some', 'deep', 'black', 'magic']; for (let temp, i = 0; i < 10000; i +=1) { temp = get(dataObject, path1); temp = get(dataObject, path2); }
Try/Catch
const dataObject = {some: {deep: {hidden: {value: 1}}}}; for (let temp, i = 0; i < 10000; i +=1) { try { temp = dataObject.some.deep.hidden.value; } catch(e) {} try { temp = dataObject.some.deep.black.magic; } catch(e) {} }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Optional chaining
Manual chaining
Loop chaining
Try/Catch
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what's being tested in the provided benchmark. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares the performance of four approaches to access nested properties in an object: 1. Optional Chaining (?.) 2. Manual Chaining (using dot notation and explicit null checks) 3. Loop Chaining (using a loop with indices) 4. Try/Catch (using try-catch blocks to access nested properties) **Optional Chaining** * Description: Uses the optional chaining operator (?.) to access nested properties. * Syntax: `dataObject.some.deep.hidden.value` * Pros: + Concise and readable syntax + Reduces boilerplate code and errors * Cons: + May not work as expected for objects with missing properties or null values + Not supported in older browsers **Manual Chaining** * Description: Uses dot notation and explicit null checks to access nested properties. * Syntax: `dataObject.some.deep.hidden.value` * Pros: + Works consistently across all browsers, including older ones + Allows for more control over error handling * Cons: + More verbose syntax can lead to errors if not used carefully **Loop Chaining** * Description: Uses a loop with indices to access nested properties. * Syntax: `for (let temp, i = 0; i < 10000; i +=1) { ... }` * Pros: + Allows for more control over the iteration process + Can be useful in certain scenarios where other approaches fail * Cons: + More complex and error-prone than other approaches **Try/Catch** * Description: Uses try-catch blocks to access nested properties. * Syntax: `try { temp = dataObject.some.deep.hidden.value; } catch(e) {}` * Pros: + Allows for explicit error handling + Works consistently across all browsers, including older ones * Cons: + More verbose syntax can lead to errors if not used carefully **Library Used** None of the benchmark approaches rely on any specific libraries. **Special JavaScript Features/Syntax** The benchmark uses the optional chaining operator (?.) and the nullish coalescing operator (??), which are relatively recent features introduced in ECMAScript 2020. These features may not be supported in older browsers or environments. **Other Alternatives** Some alternative approaches to accessing nested properties include: * Using the `in` operator to check for property existence: `if ('some' in dataObject && 'deep' in dataObject.some && 'hidden' in dataObject.some.deep) { ... }` * Using a recursive function to access nested properties: `function get(obj, path) { if (path.length === 0) return obj; let key = path.shift(); if (!obj || !(key in obj)) return null; return get(obj[key], path); }` * Using a library like Lodash or Ramda that provides utility functions for working with objects and arrays. In summary, the benchmark compares four approaches to accessing nested properties in an object, each with its pros and cons. The optimal approach depends on the specific use case, performance requirements, and browser support considerations.
Related benchmarks:
Try/Catch vs Typeof
Optional chaining vs manual chaining vs loop chaining vs Try/Catch
try-catch with artificial error vs try-catch with no error
Observables: loops with try/catch versus EventTarget
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?