Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Some vs Includes wtf
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Some vs Includes
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var data = [] var dataObj = [] for (let i = 0; i < 5000; ++i) dataObj.push({ username: 'toto' }) dataObj.push({ username: 'titi' }) for (let i = 0; i < 2500; ++i) dataObj.push({ username: 'toto' }) for (let i = 0; i < 5000; ++i) data.push('toto') data.push('titi') for (let i = 0; i < 2500; ++i) data.push('toto')
Tests:
Some
dataObj.some(e => e.username === 'titi')
Includes
data.includes('titi')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Some
Includes
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the benchmark test cases and explain what's being tested, the options compared, their pros and cons, and other considerations. **Benchmark Test Cases** The test case consists of two individual tests: 1. `Some` 2. `Includes` Both tests use a similar setup: an array `dataObj` populated with objects containing a `username` property, and another array `data` populated with strings. **Option 1: Using the `some()` method (Test Case 1: "Some")** The test case uses the `some()` method to check if any element in `dataObj` matches the condition `e.username === 'titi'`. The `some()` method returns a boolean value indicating whether at least one element passes the test. **Option 2: Using the `includes()` method (Test Case 2: "Includes")** The second test case uses the `includes()` method to check if the string `'titi'` is present in the array `data`. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **`some()` method** * Pros: + More flexible, as it allows checking for multiple conditions. + Can be used with custom callback functions. * Cons: + May have performance issues if the iteration is not optimized. 2. **`includes()` method** * Pros: + Fast and efficient, as it uses a linear search algorithm. + More readable, as it clearly expresses the intent of searching for a specific value. * Cons: + Limited to searching for exact matches only. + May have issues with performance if the iteration is not optimized. **Library Used** In both test cases, no libraries are explicitly mentioned. However, the `some()` and `includes()` methods are built-in JavaScript functions, so no additional libraries are required. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** Neither of these tests uses any special JavaScript features or syntax. They rely solely on standard JavaScript functionality. **Other Alternatives** If you needed to check for multiple conditions in the `Some` test case, you could use a combination of `some()` and conditional statements, like this: ```javascript dataObj.some(e => e.username === 'titi' && e.username !== 'toto'); ``` Alternatively, if you needed to search for an exact match in a more complex data structure (e.g., an object), you might consider using a library like Lodash or Ramda, which provide more advanced utility functions. Keep in mind that these alternatives may not be necessary for simple use cases like the ones presented in this benchmark test.
Related benchmarks:
Some vs Find vs For
test find vs some
Array includes vs some
slice vs. for
Some vs Find test2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?