Benchmark: dasdasasdasdasdfsdfasdasdqwdq w qw asda asdasd

Script Preparation code:

var artifacts = {
  getById: () => []
}

Tests:

simple function
const flatten = (artifacts, artifactId) => { const getDependencies = (artifactId) =>{ return artifacts.getById(artifactId); } return [ ...getDependencies(artifactId) ] } for(var i = 0; i < 100; i++) { flatten(artifacts, i) }
higher order function
const createFlattenr = (artifacts) => { const getDependencies = (artifactId) => artifacts.getById(artifactId); return (artifactId) => { return [ ...getDependencies(artifactId) ] } } const flatten = createFlattenr(artifacts) for(var i = 0; i < 100; i++) { flatten(i) }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
simple function
higher order function

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'll break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and the pros/cons of each approach.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark measures the performance difference between two approaches: simple functions and higher-order functions (also known as closures) in JavaScript. The test case is designed to simulate a scenario where a function needs to flatten an array of dependencies for multiple artifacts.

**Script Preparation Code**

The script preparation code defines a `artifacts` object with a single property `getById`, which returns an empty array.

```javascript
var artifacts = {
  getById: () => []
}
```

This code sets up the test environment and initializes the `artifacts` object, which will be used by both simple functions and higher-order functions.

**Html Preparation Code**

The html preparation code is null, indicating that no HTML code is required for this benchmark.

```javascript
null
```

Since there's no HTML involved, we can focus solely on the JavaScript aspect of the test.

**Individual Test Cases**

There are two test cases:

### Simple Function

```javascript
const flatten = (artifacts, artifactId) => {
  const getDependencies = (artifactId) => {
    return artifacts.getById(artifactId);
  }
  return [
    ...getDependencies(artifactId)
  ]
}

for(var i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
  flatten(artifacts, i)
}
```

In this test case, the `flatten` function takes an `artifacts` object and an `artifactId` as input. It defines a nested function `getDependencies`, which returns an array of dependencies for the given `artifactId`. The `flatten` function then uses the spread operator (`...`) to merge the dependencies array with the original array. This simple function is repeated 100 times using a `for` loop.

### Higher-Order Function

```javascript
const createFlattenr = (artifacts) => {
  const getDependencies = (artifactId) => artifacts.getById(artifactId);
  return (artifactId) => {
    return [
      ...getDependencies(artifactId)
    ]
  }
}

const flatten = createFlattenr(artifacts)

for(var i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
  flatten(i)
}
```

In this test case, the `createFlattenr` function takes an `artifacts` object as input and returns a higher-order function (`flatten`). The returned function takes an `artifactId` as input and uses the same logic as the simple function. This approach is more concise and reusable than the simple function.

**Pros/Cons of Each Approach**

* **Simple Function:**
	+ Pros:
		- Easy to understand and implement.
		- No additional memory allocation required for storing the closure.
	+ Cons:
		- Less efficient due to repeated function calls and array merging.
		- More prone to errors due to mutable state (the `getDependencies` function modifies the original array).
* **Higher-Order Function:**
	+ Pros:
		- More concise and readable code.
		- Reusable closure can be stored in memory for future use.
	+ Cons:
		- Requires more memory allocation for storing the closure.
		- Less efficient due to repeated function calls.

**Library**

The `getById` method is a custom implementation that returns an empty array. It's not a standard JavaScript library, but rather a simple helper function used in this benchmark.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark. The focus is solely on the performance difference between simple functions and higher-order functions.

Related benchmarks:

dasdasasdasdasdfsdfasdasdqwdq w qw asda asdasd (version: 0)

higher order function vs simple function perf check

Comparing performance of: simple function vs higher order function

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

simple function

higher order function

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):