Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Testing array
(version: 0)
Testing push in array
Comparing performance of:
for vs map
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
for
var a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]; var b = []; for (i = 0; i < a.length; i++) { b.push({"identifier" : a[i]}); }
map
var a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]; var b = []; b = a.map(function(i){ return {'identifier': i}; });
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
for
map
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the explanation into smaller parts to make it easier to understand. **Benchmark Definition and Script Preparation Code** The benchmark definition is a JSON object that describes the test case. In this case, the "Name" field specifies the name of the benchmark ("Testing array"), while the "Description" field provides a brief description of what's being tested (pushing an element into an array). The "Script Preparation Code" and "Html Preparation Code" fields are empty, which means no additional setup is required for the test. **Individual Test Cases** There are two individual test cases: 1. **"for"`** This test case uses a traditional `for` loop to push elements from an array (`a`) into another array (`b`). The loop iterates over the length of `a`, and for each iteration, it pushes an object containing the current element as its "identifier". 2. **"map"`** This test case uses the `Array.prototype.map()` method to create a new array with transformed elements from the original array (`a`). The transformation function returns an object with a single property, `"identifier"`, set to the value of the current element. **Comparison of Approaches** The two approaches differ in their syntax and performance: * **"for"`**: This approach uses a traditional `for` loop, which can be slower due to the overhead of looping and pushing elements into an array. * **"map"`**: This approach uses the `Array.prototype.map()` method, which is generally faster and more concise. However, it may require additional allocations for the new array. **Pros and Cons** **"for"`** Pros: * Easy to understand and implement * No additional allocations required Cons: * Can be slower due to looping overhead * More verbose code **"map"`** Pros: * Generally faster and more concise * Reduces memory allocations compared to the "for" approach Cons: * May require additional allocations for the new array * Can be less intuitive for beginners **Library Usage: `Array.prototype.map()`** The `map()` method is a standard JavaScript function that takes a callback function as an argument. The purpose of this library is to provide a concise and efficient way to transform elements in an array. **Special JS Feature/ Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these test cases. However, it's worth noting that the `map()` method is a modern JavaScript feature introduced in ECMAScript 2009. **Other Alternatives** If you want to explore alternative approaches for pushing elements into an array, here are some options: * **Using `forEach()`**: Instead of using a traditional `for` loop or `map()`, you can use the `Array.prototype.forEach()` method. * **Using `reduce()`**: While not directly applicable for this use case, `Array.prototype.reduce()` can be used to accumulate elements into an array. Keep in mind that these alternatives may require additional allocations and iterations compared to the original "for" or "map" approaches.
Related benchmarks:
comparing push vs spread one by one
spread vs push 2
Spread or Push
Spread Operator vs Push Method
spread or push on large array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?