Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
'' + vs .toString()
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
String() vs .toString()
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
String()
let num = 500; let nums = []; for(let i = 0; i < 100; ++i) { nums.push('' + num); }
.toString()
let num = 500; let nums = []; for(let i = 0; i < 100; ++i) { nums.push(num.toString()); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
String()
.toString()
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain the provided benchmark and its different approaches. The benchmark is measuring the performance of two different approaches to convert an integer to a string in JavaScript: 1. **Concatenation**: `let num = 500; let nums = []; for(let i = 0; i < 100; ++i) { nums.push('' + num); }` 2. **`toString()` method**: `let num = 500; let nums = []; for(let i = 0; i < 100; ++i) { nums.push(num.toString()); }` Let's break down each approach: **1. Concatenation** * This approach uses the `+` operator to concatenate the string `' '` with the integer `num`. * The resulting string is then pushed onto the `nums` array. * The pros of this approach are that it's simple and easy to understand. * However, the cons are: + It creates a new string object on each iteration, which can lead to performance issues due to the overhead of creating and garbage collecting objects. + The `+` operator is slow for large numbers. **2. `toString()` method** * This approach uses the `toString()` method to convert the integer `num` to a string directly. * The resulting string is then pushed onto the `nums` array. * The pros of this approach are: + It avoids the overhead of creating new string objects, which can improve performance. + It's generally faster than concatenation for large numbers. * However, the cons are: + Some older JavaScript engines may not support the `toString()` method for integers (although it's widely supported in modern browsers). + The `toString()` method can be less intuitive to understand for some developers. In general, the `toString()` method is a better approach than concatenation due to its performance benefits and reduced overhead. However, if you need to support very old JavaScript engines or have specific requirements that make concatenation necessary, it's still worth considering. Now, let's talk about other alternatives: * **Template literals**: Instead of using the `+` operator, you could use template literals (e.g., `${num}`) to create a string. This approach is generally faster and more efficient than concatenation. * **Spread syntax**: Another alternative is to use the spread syntax (`...`) to convert an integer to a string: `let nums = [...Array(100).keys()].map(x => x.toString());`. While this approach is not as straightforward as using the `toString()` method, it can be faster and more efficient in certain scenarios. In summary, the benchmark is testing the performance of two different approaches to convert an integer to a string: concatenation and the `toString()` method. The `toString()` method is generally considered the better approach due to its performance benefits and reduced overhead, but understanding the pros and cons of each approach can help you make informed decisions in your own JavaScript development projects.
Related benchmarks:
char index vs charAt() for the first character
String() vs .toString() vs + string
parseInt(stringInt) vs +stringInt
'of' vs indexed charAt() to iterate characters in a string
'a string`.toString() vs `${'a string'}`
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?