Benchmark: filter vs slice - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:

var small = Array.from({ length: 10 }, (_, i) => i);
var medium = Array.from({ length: 100 }, (_, i) => i);
var large = Array.from({ length: 1000 }, (_, i) => i);
var xlarge = Array.from({ length: 10000 }, (_, i) => i);
var xxlarge = Array.from({ length: 100000 }, (_, i) => i);
var xxxlarge = Array.from({ length: 1000000 }, (_, i) => i);
var xxxxlarge = Array.from({ length: 10000000 }, (_, i) => i);

var filter = (arr, index) => arr.filter((_, i) => i !== index);

var slice = (arr, index) => [...arr.slice(0 ,index), ...arr.slice(index+1)];

Tests:

filter small
filter(small, 5)
slice small
slice(small, 5)
filter medium
filter(medium, 50)
slice medium
slice(medium, 50)
filter large
filter(large, 500)
slice large
slice(large, 500)
filter xlarge
filter(xlarge, 5000)
slice xlarge
slice(xlarge, 5000)
filter xxlarge
filter(xxlarge, 50000)
slice xxlarge
slice(xxlarge, 50000)
filter xxxlarge
filter(xxxlarge, 50000)
slice xxxlarge
slice(xxxlarge, 500000)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
filter small
slice small
filter medium
slice medium
filter large
slice large
filter xlarge
slice xlarge
filter xxlarge
slice xxlarge
filter xxxlarge
slice xxxlarge

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 days ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:139.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/139.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 139 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
filter small	43372968.0 Ops/sec
slice small	16982518.0 Ops/sec
filter medium	6401500.0 Ops/sec
slice medium	3003215.2 Ops/sec
filter large	735355.7 Ops/sec
slice large	351273.5 Ops/sec
filter xlarge	63224.6 Ops/sec
slice xlarge	31206.9 Ops/sec
filter xxlarge	4146.4 Ops/sec
slice xxlarge	2749.1 Ops/sec
filter xxxlarge	318.5 Ops/sec
slice xxxlarge	200.2 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 6 months ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

It seems like you're providing a JSON-formatted string of data that appears to be related to browser performance testing results.

If I were to parse this data, here are some observations and findings:

**Browser Patterns**

The majority of the `RawUAString` values follow a similar pattern: "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT [version]; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/[version] (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/[version].0.0.0 Safari/[version].36 Edg/[version].0.0.0". The variations in `[version]` and the presence of different `Safari` versions suggest that the data spans a range of browser releases.

**OS and Device Platform**

The `OperatingSystem` and `DevicePlatform` fields are consistently set to "Windows" across all test cases, indicating that these tests were likely run on Windows desktops.

**Test Cases**

There are six distinct test case names: "slice medium", "slice large", "filter large", "slice xlarge", "filter xlarge", "slice xxlarge", and "filter xxlarge". These names suggest a focus on varying the size of data slices (or filters) being tested, possibly to evaluate performance under different conditions.

**Performance Metrics**

The `ExecutionsPerSecond` values provide insight into the relative performance of each test case. For example, the first two test cases ("slice medium" and "slice large") have significantly higher execution rates than the later test cases with larger data slices (e.g., "slice xlarge", "filter xlarge").

**Other Observations**

* Some test cases have very high execution rates (>100 executions per second), while others are much slower (<10 executions per second).
* The majority of tests were performed with Chrome 129, but some had Safari and Edge versions as well.
* There's a notable decrease in performance as the data slice size increases.

Please let me know if you'd like me to extract any specific insights or provide further analysis on these findings!

Related benchmarks:

filter vs slice (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: filter small vs slice small vs filter medium vs slice medium vs filter large vs slice large vs filter xlarge vs slice xlarge vs filter xxlarge vs slice xxlarge vs filter xxxlarge vs slice xxxlarge

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

filter small

slice small

filter medium

slice medium

filter large

slice large

filter xlarge

slice xlarge

filter xxlarge

slice xxlarge

filter xxxlarge

slice xxxlarge

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 6 months ago):