Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array concat vs spread operator vs pushx
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method and push
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.prototype.concat
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; params = [ ...params, "444"];
spread operator
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] params.push("444");
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.concat
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the explanation. **Benchmark Overview** The provided benchmark measures the performance of three approaches to concatenate an array in JavaScript: using the `concat()` method, the spread operator (`...`), and the `push()` method with the `x` variant (not a standard feature). **Options Compared** 1. **Array.prototype.concat()**: This is the traditional way to concatenate arrays in JavaScript. 2. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: Introduced in ES6, this operator allows you to create a new array by spreading an existing array or an array-like object. 3. **push()` with `x` variant (not standard)**: The problem statement doesn't specify what the `x` variant is, but it's likely an experimental or proprietary method for concatenating arrays. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **Array.prototype.concat()**: * Pros: widely supported, easy to use, and well-documented. * Cons: can be slow for large arrays due to the creation of a new array object. 2. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: * Pros: concise, fast, and efficient for concatenating small to medium-sized arrays. * Cons: requires modern browsers that support ES6 syntax (not all versions), and it modifies the original array if used with `params = [...params, '444']`. 3. **push()` with `x` variant**: * Since we don't know what this "variant" is, I'll assume it's not a standard feature or has no documentation. This makes it difficult to provide pros and cons. **Library and Special JS Features** There are no libraries mentioned in the benchmark definition, but the use of modern syntax (e.g., spread operator) assumes that the test environment supports ES6 features. No special JavaScript features are mentioned that would require additional explanation. **Other Alternatives** For concatenating arrays, other alternatives include: 1. **Array.prototype.push()` with multiple arguments: `params.push('444')`. 2. **Array.prototype.splice()` with an offset and length. 3. **Array.prototype.slice()` followed by concatenation using the spread operator or `concat()`. 4. **Using a custom array concatenation function (not included in this benchmark).** Keep in mind that the performance of these alternatives may vary depending on the specific use case and environment. I hope this explanation helps you understand the benchmark!
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
concat 2 arrays: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Array concat vs spread operator vs push with more data
Array concat vs spread operator vs push for single values
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator real
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?