Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash Replace/Split VS JS Replace/Split
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Lodash Replace vs JS Replace vs Lodash Split vs JS Split
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.15/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var testString = `Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed bibendum libero eu risus vehicula rutrum vel vel nisl. Maecenas nisi arcu, iaculis et odio sed, ullamcorper semper nunc. Ut finibus urna erat, quis euismod risus lacinia id. Nunc massa mi, scelerisque at convallis ac, blandit at metus. Interdum et malesuada fames ac ante ipsum primis in faucibus. In at hendrerit nunc. Donec neque turpis, ullamcorper eget volutpat id, semper eu libero. Vivamus hendrerit ultricies nibh vitae ullamcorper. Suspendisse euismod leo et ex bibendum fringilla. Curabitur quis tellus a ipsum congue blandit. Nulla vel lectus neque. Donec elit elit, luctus imperdiet nibh et, efficitur molestie tellus. Morbi volutpat, nisi in ullamcorper dictum, sapien ipsum aliquam erat, in aliquam arcu nulla sit amet felis. Fusce sed tellus consequat, pellentesque lorem nec, pulvinar ex. Suspendisse nec dapibus lectus. Morbi non tempor mauris. Vivamus nec pretium lectus, pretium laoreet quam. `
Tests:
Lodash Replace
_.replace(testString, "i", "*");
JS Replace
testString.replace("i", "*");
Lodash Split
_.split(testString, " ");
JS Split
testString.split(" ")
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Lodash Replace
JS Replace
Lodash Split
JS Split
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what is being tested, the options compared, their pros and cons, and other considerations. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is comparing the performance of two approaches: 1. Lodash Replace (using the `_.replace()` method) 2. JavaScript Replace (using the built-in `replace()` method) **Options Compared** Both methods are being tested on a large string (`testString`) with various special characters and whitespace. * Lodash Replace: + Pros: Uses a more explicit and type-safe approach, which can lead to better error handling and code maintainability. + Cons: May have performance overhead due to the additional function call and parameter passing. * JavaScript Replace: + Pros: Faster execution speed since it's a built-in method that doesn't require an extra function call or parameter passing. + Cons: Less explicit and potentially more prone to errors, especially when dealing with complex regular expressions. **Other Considerations** The benchmark also compares the performance of two other approaches: 1. Lodash Split (using the `_.split()` method) 2. JavaScript Split (using the built-in `split()` method) Similar considerations apply as above for the replacement methods. **Library Used** In this case, the Lodash library is used in the benchmark definition, specifically the `lodash.min.js` file. Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for tasks such as string manipulation, array operations, and more. The `_.replace()` and `_.split()` methods are part of the Lodash library and provide a convenient way to perform these operations on strings. **Special JS Features or Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. The code uses standard JavaScript syntax and libraries (Lodash) without any experimental features, async/await, or other advanced concepts. **Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, here are a few options: 1. **V8 Benchmark**: V8 is the JavaScript engine used by Google Chrome. You can use the V8 Benchmark suite to compare the performance of different JavaScript implementations and libraries. 2. **JSPerf**: JSPerf is another popular benchmarking tool for JavaScript. It allows you to create custom benchmarks and compare the performance of different code snippets. 3. **Benchmarking libraries**: There are several benchmarking libraries available, such as Benchmark.js or Micro-benchmark, that provide a simple way to write and run benchmarks. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different use cases and requirements than the original benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash replace VS JS Replace
regex vs includes javascript comparison
split-join vs regex replace - large input
Split join vs replace long string long string
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?