Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Iterate check
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Iterate all vs Clever iteration
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Iterate all
const a = [[1], [1,2,3], [1], [1,2,3], [1], [1,2,3]]; const b = []; a.forEach((i) => { i.forEach((j) => { b.push(j); }); });
Clever iteration
const a = [[1], [1,2,3], [1], [1,2,3], [1], [1,2,3]]; const b = []; a.forEach((i) => { if(i.length > 1) { i.forEach((j) => { b.push(j); }); } else { b.push(i[0]); } });
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Iterate all
Clever iteration
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested, compared, and other considerations. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is empty, but it provides metadata about the benchmark, such as its name and description. **Individual Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **Iterate all** This test case measures the performance of iterating over an array using `forEach`. The benchmark creates a 2D array `a` with multiple nested arrays and then iterates over it using `forEach`, pushing elements from each inner array to another array `b`. 2. **Clever iteration** This test case is similar to "Iterate all", but it adds an additional condition: if the length of an inner array `i` is greater than 1, it iterates over its elements; otherwise, it pushes the first element of `i` to `b`. This test case appears to be comparing the performance of iterating over arrays with varying lengths. **Options Compared** The two test cases compare the performance of: * Iterating over an array using `forEach` * Applying a conditional statement before iterating over an inner array **Pros and Cons** * **Iterate all**: This approach is straightforward and easy to understand. However, it may lead to unnecessary iterations if there are arrays with lengths greater than 1. * **Clever iteration**: This approach takes advantage of the fact that some arrays have a small number of elements. By pushing the first element of such arrays directly to `b`, it avoids unnecessary iterations. However, this approach requires additional logic and may be less intuitive for readers unfamiliar with it. **Library Used** None. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being used in these test cases. **Other Considerations** * The use of 2D arrays with varying lengths makes the benchmark more challenging, as it requires iterating over different numbers of elements. * The performance difference between "Iterate all" and "Clever iteration" may be small for small input sizes but become more significant for larger inputs. **Alternatives** If you were to modify these test cases or create new ones, you could consider the following alternatives: * Use a different data structure, such as an object with array values, to make the benchmarking process easier. * Add additional conditions or logic to the `forEach` callbacks to simulate real-world scenarios. * Experiment with different iteration methods, such as using `for...in` or `reduce()`, to compare their performance. In summary, these test cases measure the performance of iterating over arrays using `forEach` and applying conditional statements before iterating over inner arrays. While "Clever iteration" takes advantage of the fact that some arrays have a small number of elements, it requires additional logic and may be less intuitive for readers unfamiliar with it.
Related benchmarks:
for loop vs every
Bitmask implicit boolean vs bitmask explicit equals
Check value in string
Try/catch performance for control flow #3
endsWith() vs Ordinary For loop
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?