Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Spread vs Push to Same Array v1
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Spread vs Push
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Spread
let arr1 = ['a', 'b', 'c'] arr1 = [...arr1,'d']
Push
const arr1 = ['a', 'b', 'c'] arr1.push('d')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Spread
Push
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a simple JavaScript statement that creates an array `arr1` with initial values `'a'`, `'b'`, and `'c'`. Then, it assigns a new value `'d'` to the last element of the array using two different methods: * **Spread**: `arr1 = [...arr1,'d']` * **Push**: `const arr1 = ['a', 'b', 'c']; arr1.push('d');` The purpose of this benchmark is to compare the performance of these two approaches: spreading an existing array to create a new one and using the `push()` method to append elements. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares two options: * **Spread**: Using the spread operator (`...`) to create a new array by copying the existing array's values and then appending `'d'`. * **Push**: Using the `push()` method to add an element to the end of the existing array. **Pros and Cons** **Spread:** Pros: * Creates a new, shallow copy of the original array, which can be useful for certain use cases. * Can be more efficient than pushing elements on large arrays. Cons: * Creates a new object every time it's used, which can lead to higher memory allocation costs. * May not preserve the original array's prototype chain. **Push:** Pros: * Modifies the existing array in place, reducing memory allocation costs. * Preserves the original array's prototype chain. Cons: * Can be slower for very large arrays due to the overhead of pushing elements. * Creates a new object reference when using `const` declarations. **Other Considerations** * The benchmark doesn't consider other methods for appending elements, such as slicing and concatenating or using `Array.prototype.set()`. * It also doesn't account for potential performance differences between modern browsers and older versions. **Library Usage** None of the provided test cases uses any external libraries. However, if you were to add more complexity to your benchmark, you might consider using a library like Lodash or Underscore.js to simplify some operations or provide additional functionality. **Special JS Features/Syntax** The benchmark doesn't use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what's standard in ECMAScript. It's designed to be straightforward and easy to understand for developers familiar with basic JavaScript concepts. **Alternative Benchmarks** If you wanted to explore other approaches, here are some examples of alternative benchmarks: * **Slicing vs Push**: Instead of spreading an array, create a new array using the `slice()` method or concatenation. * **Array.prototype.map() vs Looping**: Compare the performance of using `map()` to iterate over elements versus traditional looping. * **Caching vs No Caching**: Measure the impact of caching results in your benchmark. I hope this explanation helps you understand the provided benchmark and its design!
Related benchmarks:
Pushing items via Array.push vs. Spread Operator
Javascript: Spread vs push
JS array spread operator vs push
Array .push() vs spread operator
Spread vs Push when adding into array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?