Benchmark: your babe - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:

var x = [];
var y = [];

x.push({id: 'a',value: 1});
x.push({id: 'b', value: 2}); 
x.push({id:'c', value: 3});
x.push({id:'d', value:4});

y['a']=1;
y['b']=2;
y['c']=3;
y['d']=4;

Tests:

dic
for(i = 0; i< 200; ++i){ let y1 = y['a']; let y2 = y['d']; }
array
for(i = 0; i< 200; ++i){ x.filter(each => each.id = 'a'); x.filter(each => each.id = 'd'); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
dic
array

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'll break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark definition is a JSON object that contains information about the test case. In this case, there are two test cases:

1. "dic" - This test case uses a simple loop to access elements in an object (`y`) using key-value pairs.
2. "array" - This test case uses the `filter()` method to filter elements in an array (`x`) based on a condition.

**Script Preparation Code**

The script preparation code is a JavaScript snippet that sets up the data structures used in the benchmark tests:
```javascript
var x = []; // empty array
var y = []; // empty object

x.push({id: 'a', value: 1});
x.push({id: 'b', value: 2});
x.push({id: 'c', value: 3});
x.push({id: 'd', value: 4});

y['a'] = 1;
y['b'] = 2;
y['c'] = 3;
y['d'] = 4;
```
This code creates an empty array `x` and an object `y`, and then populates them with data using the `push()` method.

**Html Preparation Code**

The html preparation code is currently set to null, which means that no HTML setup is required for this benchmark.

**Library Usage**

None of the test cases use any external libraries. However, it's worth noting that the `filter()` method used in the "array" test case is a native JavaScript method.

**Special JS Features/Syntax**

Neither of the test cases uses any special JavaScript features or syntax. They are straightforward and easily understandable by anyone familiar with basic JavaScript concepts.

**Other Alternatives**

If you were to rewrite this benchmark using alternative approaches, here are some options:

1. **Using `forEach()` instead of loops**: You could use the `forEach()` method to iterate over the elements in the array or object instead of using a traditional loop.
2. **Using `map()` and reduce()`**: You could use the `map()` and `reduce()` methods to transform and aggregate data in the array or object, potentially leading to more efficient performance.
3. **Using Web Workers**: If you wanted to test concurrent execution, you could consider using Web Workers to run multiple iterations of the benchmark simultaneously.

However, these alternatives would likely change the script preparation code and might not be as straightforward to understand or implement for most developers.

Related benchmarks:

your babe (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: dic vs array

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

dic

array

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):