Benchmark: js vs jquery v2.2.4

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-2.2.4.min.js"></script>
<h1 id="test">Hello World</h3>

Tests:

js
var text = document.getElementById("test");
jquery v2.2.4
var text = jQuery("#test");

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
js
jquery v2.2.4

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 4 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/142.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 142 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
js	9395060.0 Ops/sec
jquery v2.2.4	2528798.2 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases.

**Benchmark Definition**

The website `MeasureThat.net` allows users to create microbenchmarks for various JavaScript scenarios. In this case, we have two benchmarks: one testing plain JavaScript (`js`) and another testing jQuery version 2.2.4 (`jquery v2.2.4`). The benchmark definition consists of a JSON object that contains the following information:

* `Name`: a unique identifier for the benchmark
* `Description`: a brief description of the benchmark
* `Script Preparation Code`: an optional code snippet to prepare the JavaScript environment before running the test (empty in this case)
* `Html Preparation Code`: an HTML snippet that sets up the webpage with jQuery and an ID (`#test`) to be used later

**Test Cases**

There are two individual test cases:

1. **js**: This test case uses plain JavaScript to retrieve an element by its ID using `document.getElementById`.
2. **jquery v2.2.4**: This test case uses jQuery version 2.2.4 to retrieve an element by its ID using `jQuery("#test")`.

**Library: jQuery**

In the benchmark, jQuery is used as a library to simplify DOM manipulation and event handling tasks. In this specific test case, it's used to retrieve an element by its ID, which is then stored in the `text` variable.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax (None)**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested in these benchmarks. The tests only involve standard JavaScript and jQuery functions.

**Options Compared**

The two test cases compare plain JavaScript (`js`) against jQuery version 2.2.4 (`jquery v2.2.4`). This comparison aims to measure the performance difference between using native JavaScript for DOM manipulation versus relying on a library like jQuery.

**Pros and Cons of Different Approaches:**

1. **Plain JavaScript (`js`)**:
	* Pros:
		+ Native performance since it doesn't rely on an external library
		+ Control over implementation details
	* Cons:
		+ Requires more manual DOM manipulation, which can be error-prone and slower than using a library
2. **jQuery (`jquery v2.2.4`)**:
	* Pros:
		+ Faster performance since it's implemented in native code
		+ Simplifies DOM manipulation and event handling tasks
	* Cons:
		+ Relying on an external library can introduce overhead and dependencies

**Other Considerations:**

When choosing between plain JavaScript and jQuery, consider the following factors:

* Performance-critical applications where every millisecond matters
* Projects with large-scale DOM manipulation or complex layouts
* Applications with tight security constraints or strict compatibility requirements

If you're already using a JavaScript library or framework for your project, it might be more practical to stick with that ecosystem. However, if you need fine-grained control over DOM manipulation or prefer a lightweight solution, plain JavaScript can be a viable option.

**Alternatives:**

Some alternative libraries and frameworks that offer similar functionality to jQuery include:

* Lodash: A utility library for functional programming
* React or Angular: Frontend frameworks that provide built-in DOM manipulation and event handling mechanisms
* Vanilla.js: A modern JavaScript library that provides a set of utility functions for DOM manipulation and event handling

Keep in mind that these alternatives might not offer the same performance or simplicity as jQuery, but they can provide more control over implementation details and be suitable for specific use cases.

Related benchmarks:

js vs jquery v2.2.4 (version: 0)

js vs jquery get ID

Comparing performance of: js vs jquery v2.2.4

Created: 9 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

js

jquery v2.2.4

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):