Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
arra vs concat1231324
(version: 0)
dgf
Comparing performance of:
push vs concat
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
arr = []
Tests:
push
for (i=0; i<10000; i++) { arr.push[i] }
concat
for (i=0; i<10000; i++) { arr.concat[i] }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
push
concat
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain the benchmarking scenario and options being compared. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is comparing the performance of two approaches for creating an array in JavaScript: 1. `push()`: Adding elements to the end of an existing array using the `push()` method. 2. `concat()`: Creating a new array by concatenating an existing array with a new element or array using the `concat()` method. **Options Being Compared** The benchmark is comparing these two approaches for creating an array: * `arr.push[i]`: Using `push()` to add elements to the end of the array. * `arr.concat[i]`: Using `concat()` to create a new array by concatenating with a new element or array. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **`push()`**: * Pros: More efficient, as it doesn't create a new array object. It's also more concise and readable. * Cons: Can be slower for very large arrays due to the overhead of adding elements to the end of an existing array. 2. **`concat()`**: * Pros: Creates a new array object that can be used independently, making it easier to manipulate or further process the data. * Cons: Less efficient than `push()`, as it creates a new array object and copies all elements from the original array. **Library** There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmarking scenario. However, the use of JavaScript syntax suggests that the test cases are running on native JavaScript, without any additional libraries or frameworks. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** The `push()` and `concat()` methods are built-in JavaScript methods for adding elements to an array and creating a new array by concatenating with another element or array, respectively. These features are not specific to any particular library or framework. **Other Considerations** When deciding between `push()` and `concat()`, it's essential to consider the specific use case and requirements of your application. If you need to create an independent array that can be manipulated separately, `concat()` might be a better choice. However, if you're working with large arrays and want to optimize performance, `push()` could be a more efficient option. **Alternative Benchmarks** Other alternatives for creating arrays in JavaScript include: * Using the spread operator (`[...]`) or the `Array.from()` method. * Creating an array using the `new Array()` constructor. * Using libraries like Lodash or Ramda, which provide additional utility functions for working with arrays. It's worth noting that these alternatives might have different performance characteristics compared to `push()` and `concat()`, and may be more suitable for specific use cases.
Related benchmarks:
Concat vs spread operators
Array push vs spread vs concat
Array concat vs. spread operator
Array push vs spread vs concat large
flat map vs reduce concat for real
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?