Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
JavaScript spread operator perfornance comparisons
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Using the spread operator vs Using single item addition. vs using object assign
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Using the spread operator
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const finalObject = { ...firstObject, ...{ moreData: 'foo bar' } };
Using single item addition.
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const finalObject = { ...firstObject, moreData: 'foo bar', };
using object assign
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' } const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' } const finalObject = Object.assign(firstObject, secondObject)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Using the spread operator
Using single item addition.
using object assign
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the provided benchmark data. The main purpose of this benchmark is to compare three different approaches for creating objects with merged data in JavaScript: 1. **Spread operator** (`...`): This syntax allows you to merge two objects by spreading their properties and values into a new object. 2. **Single item addition**: In this approach, each property from the source object is added individually using the `+=` or `+=` operators. 3. **Object assign** (`Object.assign()`: This method returns a new object with the properties of the source objects merged. Now, let's break down the pros and cons of each approach: * **Spread operator**: Pros: + Concise and readable syntax + Fast performance (compared to other approaches) * Cons: + May not be as intuitive for beginners or those unfamiliar with spread operators * **Single item addition**: Pros: + Can be useful in specific situations where you need more control over the merge process + Easy to understand and implement * Cons: + More verbose than the spread operator syntax + May be slower due to the repeated assignment operations * **Object assign**: Pros: + Provides more control over the merge process, as you can specify the source objects and properties to merge + Can be useful in complex scenarios where multiple objects need to be merged * Cons: + Requires more code than the spread operator or single item addition + May have performance implications due to the creation of intermediate objects It's worth noting that the benchmark results show significant differences between these approaches, with the spread operator being the fastest. However, the actual performance impact may vary depending on the specific use case and JavaScript engine. As for libraries or special features in this benchmark, there are no notable ones mentioned in the provided data. The focus is solely on comparing different JavaScript syntaxes for object merging. Other alternatives to these approaches might include: * **Object.create()**: A method that creates a new object with a specified prototype, which can be used as an alternative to `Object.assign()` or spread operator. * **Object.freeze()** and **Object.seal()**: These methods modify the original objects being merged, making them read-only (freeze) or non-configurable (seal), respectively. This approach can provide additional security features but may not be suitable for all use cases. Keep in mind that these alternatives might have different performance characteristics and use cases compared to the spread operator, single item addition, and object assign approaches.
Related benchmarks:
float vs tofixed (kostian)
parseInt() VS x.toFixed()
toFixed vs Math.round vs |(bitwise or)
ParseInt vs conditional ~~
ParseInt vs conditional ~~ vs toFixed
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?