Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Find index of select option
(version: 0)
Find one option's index in select element
Comparing performance of:
For..Loop vs FindIndex
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<select> <option value="Strawberry">Strawberry</option> <option value="Blueberry">Blueberry</option> <option value="Peach">Peach</option> <option value="Pomegranate">Pomegranate</option> <option value="Grape">Grape</option> <option value="Banana">Banana</option> <option value="Cherry">Cherry</option> <option value="Pineapple">Pineapple</option> <option value="Pear">Pear</option> <option value="Plum">Plum</option> <option value="Muskmelon">Muskmelon</option> <option value="Avocado">Avocado</option> <option value="Apricot">Apricot</option> <option value="Mango">Mango</option> <option value="Apple">Apple</option> <option value="Papaya">Papaya</option> <option value="Lemon">Lemon</option> <option value="Coconut">Coconut</option> <option value="Jackfruit">Jackfruit</option> <option value="Nectarine">Nectarine</option> <option value="Strawberry">Strawberry</option> <option value="Blueberry">Blueberry</option> <option value="Peach">Peach</option> <option value="Pomegranate">Pomegranate</option> <option value="Grape">Grape</option> <option value="Green Banana">Green Banana</option> <option value="Cherry">Cherry</option> <option value="Pineapple">Pineapple</option> <option value="Pear">Pear</option> <option value="Plum">Plum</option> <option value="Muskmelon">Muskmelon</option> <option value="Avocado">Avocado</option> <option value="Apricot">Apricot</option> <option value="Mango">Mango</option> <option value="Apple">Apple</option> <option value="Papaya">Papaya</option> <option value="Lemon">Lemon</option> <option value="Coconut">Coconut</option> <option value="Jackfruit">Jackfruit</option> <option value="Nectarine">Nectarine</option> </select>
Tests:
For..Loop
const selectElement = document.querySelector('select'); let selectedIndex = -1; for (let i = 0; i < selectElement.options.length; i++) { if (selectElement.options[i].value === 'Green Banana') { selectedIndex = i; break; } }
FindIndex
const selectElement = document.querySelector('select'); const selectedIndex = [...selectElement.options].findIndex(o => o.value === 'Green Banana');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
For..Loop
FindIndex
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**What is being tested:** MeasureThat.net is testing the performance of two approaches to find the index of an option in a `select` element: 1. **For...Loop**: This approach uses a traditional `for` loop to iterate through each option in the `select` element and checks if the value matches `'Green Banana'`. If it does, the index is stored in the `selectedIndex` variable. 2. **FindIndex**: This approach uses the Array.prototype.findIndex() method to find the index of the first occurrence of an element with a specific value (`'Green Banana'`) in the array of options. **Options compared:** The two approaches are being compared to determine which one is faster for finding the index of an option in a `select` element. **Pros and Cons:** * **For...Loop**: + Pros: - Easy to understand and implement. - Works well for small arrays. + Cons: - Can be slow for large arrays due to the overhead of the loop. - Not as efficient as other methods like `findIndex`. * **FindIndex**: + Pros: - Fast and efficient for finding a single element in an array. - Does not require manual looping or indexing. + Cons: - May not be suitable for all use cases, such as when the array is very large. - Can be slower than traditional looping methods like `for` loop if the array is very small. **Library usage:** In both test cases, no libraries are used. The `findIndex()` method is a built-in JavaScript method that searches for an element in an array and returns its index. **Special JS features or syntax:** There is no special JS feature or syntax being tested in these examples. They use standard JavaScript constructs like `for` loops, arrays, and the `querySelector()` method to manipulate the DOM. **Other alternatives:** If you were to implement this benchmark from scratch, other approaches could be: * Using the Array.prototype.indexOf() method instead of findIndex() * Using a library like jQuery to simplify the process * Implementing a custom algorithm or data structure for faster lookup * Using Web Workers or other parallel processing techniques to speed up the tests Keep in mind that these alternatives may not provide significant performance gains, and the existing approaches using `findIndex()` and traditional looping should be sufficient for most use cases.
Related benchmarks:
JQuery: find with selected selector vs filter selected selector
Looping variable vs elements
For Loop vs While Loop vs indexOf vs includes
Searching in an array of objects
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?