Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Object assign vs spread operator benchmark
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
assign vs spread operator
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var numbers = [...Array(10).keys()] var alphabets = [...'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz'] var obj1 = { ...numbers } var obj2 = { ...alphabets }
Tests:
assign
var result = Object.assign(obj1, obj2);
spread operator
var result = { ...obj1, ...obj2 };
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
assign
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and its test cases. **Benchmark Purpose** The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches for assigning properties from one object to another: `Object.assign()` and the spread operator (`{ ... }`). **Options Compared** Two options are compared: 1. **Object.assign()**: This method copies the enumerable properties of source objects to a target object. It's a built-in JavaScript method that has been around since the early days of the language. 2. **Spread Operator ({ ... })**: This is a relatively new feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). The spread operator allows you to copy the properties of an object by spreading its key-value pairs into another object. **Pros and Cons** **Object.assign():** Pros: * Widespread support across browsers and platforms * Well-established and widely used in JavaScript development Cons: * Can be slower due to the overhead of creating a new object and iterating over the properties * May not work as expected if the source objects contain non-enumerable properties or if the target object is not a plain object **Spread Operator:** Pros: * Fast and efficient, as it only copies the enumerable properties from the source object to the target object * Modern and widely adopted in JavaScript development Cons: * May not work across all browsers and platforms (e.g., older versions of Internet Explorer) * Can lead to unexpected behavior if not used carefully (e.g., when dealing with non-enumerable properties or objects with inherited properties) **Library Used** None, as both options are native to JavaScript. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The spread operator is a relatively new feature introduced in ES6. It's also known as the "Rest Operator" or "Spread Syntax." **Other Alternatives** If you need to assign properties from one object to another, but don't want to use either `Object.assign()` or the spread operator, you can consider using: * **Lodash's _.assign()**: A popular utility library that provides a more convenient and expressive way to assign properties. * **Merges** libraries: There are several libraries available that provide a simpler and more efficient way to merge objects, such as `merge-deep` or `merge-objects`. In summary, the benchmark compares two widely used approaches for assigning properties from one object to another: `Object.assign()` and the spread operator. The spread operator is generally faster but may not work across all browsers and platforms, while `Object.assign()` has wider support but may be slower and more prone to errors.
Related benchmarks:
object assign vs object spread on growing objects
Object.assign vs spread operator vs property accessor
object spread vs Object.assign
Object.assign() vs spread operator (New object)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?